Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
*At 11:20 this morning Angela Rayner will kick off the comedy sketch show that is being billed as the labour party conference. Word is she wants to make misogyny an offence, and there was me thinking, as all Tories are scum, surely that includes the female members.
As a prelude to this farce, Keir Starmer has announced a £1.5 billion plan to coerce NHS staff to work overtime to clear the backlog of procedures.
Where the £1.5 billion is coming from is anyone's guess *
Back taxes from those well known non doms :) ???
Apparently scrapping high speed from Birmingham to Manchester but continuing to central london to Euston :) As a yorkshire voter I agree it is a disgrace and I have never voted labour before but they will have my vote at next election....Tories have been a joke since buffoon Boris onwards.
It’s a shame people have overstretched on their mortgages and assumed the era of low rates would continue indefinitely. What we have now are normalised rates based on a historical past. At least house prices are dropping for those keen to get on the housing market.
not sure youngsters had any option but to get max mtge in order to get on housing ladder....would be good if prices dropped a fair bit although could cause problems for those already committed. I do not really agree with lloyds idea of being a huge landlord . Remember the disastrous foray into estate agencies , black horse agencies dont think this will end well either
But anybody know what is happening ? the shares in my account still show at suspended price ,we should either be able to trade shares or be told they are no longer in business.....do you know scaredy :):)
Well scaredy if I sold your car and then told you I did not get the money I suspect you would think that a dodgy deal had been done of course you would not call it a crime even if it involved millions of pounds because I guess despite your reassurances over the years you are an accomplice....
Scaredy cat...... is that the ramper who declared he/ she had no link to the company at all....:)
Ah I see scaredy cat has reared his /her head the person who regularly denied having close involvement with the company in the past and who disappeared off the scene when all went tits up...how can a company sell its assets for 1 million and not be sure they have the money for the owners (shareholders ) when the deal was done ? THe shares were suspended with no chance for the shareholders to sell until the deal was done if it does not smell of a fraud , deception then I dont know what does ? needs a thorough investigation by the authorities
So where is the money from the sale of the main assets to the indian company ? Absolute scam and should be investigated by stock market authorities, so pleased I sold half my shares when the price was good....bad for all shareholders and agree these people should not be allowed to run companies in the future
Yes the main assets appear to have been hived off with no benefit to the owners (the shareholders) we had shares valued at
between 40 and 50p and now the company has been renamed without the value what happened to the rules of the stockmarket and companies house !!!!!!!!!! If it had been a private company the boss would have called in the fraud squad by now
Anyone got any updates re shares and change of company name to launch my career I presume at some point we can get a few pence for our shares :)
So basically they are taking the main assets out of the business and leaving us with a pile of ~### so what has happened to the money from the sale of these assets ?????
What were they paid what was the debt the shares were worth 46 p not long before suspension so the value of the business was substantial
Seized not ceased although maybe ceased is appropriate!!
Yes all may be lost but I do not see why given the circumstances we should all lie down and accept it so the more who complain the better why should they get away with this , had similar before but this is even more blatant changing the name of the company twice issuing new shares when the owners (shareholders ) have not been told and not given the opportunity to trade even at a low amount ...the directors of all these so called companies should be struck off and the assets of the company ceased and sold and distributed to the original owners...us !!!!
This.
We thank you for taking the time to contact us and we hope that our response to your concerns has been helpful. If however you find that our response has been unsatisfactory and you feel you have grounds to make a complaint against the FCA on this matter, you may wish to refer to our website on how to do so, by clicking here.
If any further information comes to your attention in relation to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us at primary.market.integrity@fca.org.uk.
Yours sincerely,
Market Integrity Unit
Thank you for your email of 16 May 2023. We have noted the concerns you have raised in respect of Dev Clever Holdings plc (the “Company”).
This matter has been received by the Market Integrity Unit in the Market Oversight Directorate (MO) of the FCA. MO is responsible, among other things, for monitoring issuers’ compliance with the Market Abuse Regulation.
To the extent that the matters you have raised fall within our regulatory remit, we are reviewing the issues that you have brought to our attention with a view to determining whether it is appropriate for us to exercise any of our statutory powers. As part of such reviews we may use the information gathering powers available to us to seek further information from the subjects of the enquiry and reach out to other agencies as appropriate.
If the Company is a public limited company incorporated in England and Wales, it may be that the matter would be of interest to the Companies Investigations team in the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).
Once we have completed our review, we will consider whether it is appropriate for the FCA to launch a formal investigation via its Enforcement Division, whether some other form of intervention is required or whether the case should be closed with no action. In particular, an important part of our consideration is the potential seriousness of the misconduct.
As noted in our Approach to Enforcement, not all breaches of our rules or requirements constitute serious misconduct, however, where we suspect serious misconduct, we will start an enforcement investigation. We use our experience and judgement to ascertain whether this suspicion exists and there are a number of considerations we take into account when doing so. Chapter 2 of our Approach to Enforcement document provides further detail on these considerations, which include the nature of the actual and potential harm involved; the extent to which the suspected misconduct has or may affect consumers, markets or firms if we do not take action; and the public interest in investigating the matter.
As a matter of policy, we do not provide details to members of the public about the content of our assessments (including where we decide that there are no grounds for further action). Unless our work results in a public disciplinary outcome, the FCA does not comment on these matters. We understand that this can sometimes be frustrating but you can find further information on why we take this approach here.
Please be assured that we take all complaints raised against issuers of securities subject to our rules seriously and we are considering the concerns that you have raised. We will contact you if we have any questions regarding the issues that you have raised and apologise for being unable to provide you with any further details, but we trust that you will understand the reasons for