Member Info for Spikeyj

yeah, a bit like i will propose to winona ryder once i have recovered my long lost youth. i see little that could go wrong with that plan. gl.

the company should provide some update about likely timescale to resolve their situation. it is not good for confidence of potential new clients, nor for staff members, for company to remain in suspension with no indication as yet when suspension can be lifted. it's the 3rd suspension in a year --- one lasted less than 2 weeks, when they lost their nomad, but the other one lasted more than 5 months, the last time that they were unable to publish their accounts on time. .. this time ??

not at all earth-shattering, but seems reasonably on course. still hold for me. am additionally encouraged by the recent bod purchases. gl.

at sula this morning, organised via DAN.

one or two more.

thank you. interesting, & sobering.

gs, what do you think the bank itself is worth if sold, given current circumstances? ta.

sep blatter? rob terry?

nice.

v. true, but also jolly cassandra?

mind you, if the CFO sells out entirely, think i would change my view then! lol. gl.

cfo sold 1 mill out of 2.4 mill http://www.digitallook.com/news/dealings-round-up/clinigen-directors-cash-in-options--888177.html so question is, sensible top-slice, or doomed company?

it does rather depend why they have sold. if it's just guys cashing in some of their chips 'cos they've had a lovely rise, and now want to enjoy some of the fruits of their labours, that's one thing. but if on the other hand they have sold because they think they can see escalating threats to clinigen's business model, that's another! so it is advisable to look around & check if any new issues. atb.

too soon, of course : (

added

"Why the increase in office space (at least x10)?" i agree that one is very interesting for bulls. it would seem crazy to do that if they didn't have some fairly specific ideas on expansion.

"can only happen when the auditors have seen the accounts. They haven't" vs "They have had the accounts since March" re rangers, like i said, i don't actually follow that story, so i don't know how much, if anything, has changed *recently* about likely return to creditors, i.e. if that is relevant to Dan's recent accounts issue. just at a casual glance from wikipedia, the law financial issue was most recently known twist to the saga" [but can hardly expect wikip to be cutting edge on this, lol] "In June 2015, BDO proposed an interim payment of £10 million to creditors, between 6p and 7p in every £1 owed.[27] Most of the funds were obtained from a successful legal action against Collyer Bristow, the firm of solicitors that acted for Craig Whyte during his takeover of Rangers.[27] This interim payment was due to be made by the end of July 2015, but was delayed by a claim made by Law Financial Ltd.[28] A further payout to creditors depends on the final result of the dispute with HMRC"

how beastly!

catch 07:06: "This is not a suspension following "going concerns" because that can only happen when the auditors have seen the accounts. They haven't .... The following is total BS (keep trying mate)" catch 08:38: "You are in fact right but it is highly unlikely that the auditors would express going concerns so late in the day i.e when accounts are due to be published. They have had the accounts since March..." - make your mind up catch. (not me talking BS here.)

one question would be, when did it become apparent just how severely impaired rangers debt would be - did that change recently? (i haven't been following that saga, don't know). other consideration, it is possible that the auditors *had* already expressed reservations /questions to the BoD at an earlier point, & where then waiting for BoD to provide some answers/remediation etc. to address those issues. that would be a standard process. the RNS history doesn't tell us when any such issues were raised. (mind you, presumably the nomad must have thought that there was at least some non-trivial chance that they could have published the accounts on 30/9, otherwise nomad should have blocked the RNS saying that they were working towards producing by that date?)