Member Info for Spikeyj

what do you think are the fundamentals making it worth higher? share price has pretty much fallen back to where it was before RT.

i don't mind if it goes up, down or nowhere. i have no skin in this game, just watching. but since RT has sold out, not so interesting as it used to be, from my perspective. i'm neutral about the company itself. 6 trades in total today, for just over £8,000. for substantive movement, IMTK will need substantive news/updates, good or bad.

back

i think he's gone out to buy a bigger calculator.

fantasy call would have been better to cut more, of course, how i love my hindsight.

have not looked at it for ages. last i glanced, they seemed to have lost several senior staff, but i'm really not in tune with the prospects there. i'm in relatively risk averse mode, so don't have too much in many of the smaller caps & tech stocks, just watching & playing a few.

i missed the boat, thought about going long, but dawdled. if i were long at this point, think i'd cut 20% around here, another 30-40% a pound higher. but overall my equity trading instincts not strong. i'm not bad enough to be a contra-indicator, quite.

quite a squeeze in progress, a splash of claret on the tiles.

this one bounces as much as rio.

phew, crawling towards 12... asthmatic progress, but could be a lot worse in chaotic world.

& gone. worth doing, but not particularly exciting.

still, as the old saying goes, good investment isn't meant to be exciting.

this is about as exciting as watching a well applied coat of paint dry to a smooth finish.

well, it's fraudulent if a company says says something in an RNS which it knows simply isn't true. if you choose to believe that DAN bb were secretly *not* making 'best efforts' to find a new nomad, that's up to you (... but it's hard to see why you would then trust the company about anything else that it has to say. after all, if a company lies in one RNS, what's to say it isn't lying on other occasions too?) ...for the avoidance of doubt, i am *not* suggesting myself that DAN bb were lying in their RNS when they said that they were trying but failing to find another nomad. -- i think they just genuinely failed.

although in such a case, presumably one would expect that the company would not claim that it was making best efforts to remain listed? - instead, it would explain that it was *not* seeking another nomad because etc etc?

if you're right, which i very much doubt, then the company would not have been telling the truth in the RNS of 15th jan, particularly where they said: "Despite it's best efforts, the Company has so far been unable to secure such an appointment." since if they were deliberately not finding a new one as you suggest, they would hardly have been using 'best efforts', were they? (... perhaps depends partly on whether or not you think the BoD of DAN likely to be truthful in RNS statements?)

(just a shame that the company isn't prepared to back it up with publication of audited accounts, on the record statements attributed to named BoD members, about cash, plans, contracts etc. along with a nice, clearly transparent matched bargain system where people can receive proper feedback, through actual traded prices, about what their shares are really worth.)

and to add to your confidence and happiness, an anonymous poster on this bulletin board, indigo, has told you that they have been in contact with an unnamed source at DAN, who has told them that according to DAN it's all going to be fine, just fine. (& if DAN say DAN is fine, then DAN is fine, right? (?))

lol, indeed he is fairly careful not to lose too much of his own money, but perhaps not so careful with others'.

i have already said why i'm here. i find it interesting and entertaining to watch some of the things mr rt gets up to, and some of the methods used. i have never had any financial stake, not long nor short, in dan, nor will i have. (your choice of course if you choose to believe indigopot's tales about evil shorters, who knows, there be some somewhere, but i am not of 'em.) are you really, genuinely, seriously claiming to be long DAN? my hat off to you for sheer uncomprehending bravery if you are.