Member Info for Spikeyj

.

goodluckall 25th jan: ""yes but they were not sold onto the open market. they were given/sold to friends and family. this is why they should not of had any impact on the share price." goodluckall today: "i do nt believe they were sold to 'family and friends' in the first place!!!" (perhaps depends how RT defines a 'friend'?)

.

if admin block you, goodluckall, that's to do with the content of the posts that you choose to make, & whether or not it breaks lse t&c.

progress, or further falls, depends on what is actually happening with the company and its business. last year the company gave a trading update on 11th feb, so perhaps one should be coming v. soon, for good or ill. .....meanwhile, still a few hours to go, but currently does't look very likely that goodluckall's 5p end of week prediction will be met... (but one never knows, a mid-afternoon very upbeat trading update RNS could still do it)

(rio seems to stand better chance than many to at least survive, imv)

unless the world is ending (always possible) there will need to be commodities houses in business, and making money in order to do that. so on a longer term view, it's perfectly possible that one or more of the big comm. stocks will do very well. but, but, but, .. question is, which of the comm stocks will go bust this year or next, and be torn to pieces by the others? - pick the survivor for a long term outcome. but it's a bit like trying to work out which of the various small pygmy-shrew type things, flying reptiles, nautiloids etc, have the best chance of surviving the endless winter following a mega-asteroid hitting off yucatan.

some posters have suggested joining blueshare group, where there is apparently a larger pool of pis discussing DAN than here. so you may wish to try that? presumably it might also be worth contacting the company, asking about its proposals for keeping shareholders updated. it's hard to know what can sensibly be said about whether or not they will be relisted, as the company never really said very much about why exactly they delisted in the first place, & why they lost their nomad (again), which makes it hard to know, from the outside at least, what remedial steps they need to take. gl.

cat surely does look dead, just needs stuffing now. taxi! [dermist] for prudential ...

does move

this may just be a bit of a terminally ill moggy bounce, but nonetheless i'm pathetically grateful for it in this market.

... that has been suggested to him before on this bb...

np.

; )

hi tyla, no, i'm not related to him, and i have done no business with him. used to own some shares in qpp. didn't know about rt when first in. i made good money on the way up, got out in the first big fall, so overall had net profit on qpp, but that was where i became increasingly intrigued by his machinations. i think he is a complex, complex character, whose businesses are at best opaque. so i watch with interest to learn more about the kind of games he plays, and to see what might happen to him next. (i am still curious, for example, to see what conclusions the SFO reach about the various parties who were involved in qpp's ipo.) i hope your deal on the other bb actually gets executed for you. gl.

ben, i think rt's 'friends' are still selling. sometimes they pause, & try to massage sp up with very small buy sequences, but they still have more to dump, imv.

fair enough. gl. meantime, i think i'll stick with my overall hypothesis about some deluded punter trying to massage the sp with other very small trades.

8-Feb-16 14:08:19 2.8500 50,000 Buy* 2.50 3.00 £1,425 08-Feb-16 12:37:01 2.7501 50,000 Sell* 2.75 3.50 £1,375 08-Feb-16 09:46:34 2.7501 50,000 Sell* 3.00 3.75 £1,375

i see three 50,000 trades listed for today. two look more like sells, around 2.75p when the offer price appeared as 3.50p. but of course the lse price data lags. were all three of them your buys today?

that was in the january update from the 'patient capital' fund. no change declared in income fund.