Member Info for spike912

Mytonn yes I’m saying that, 100%, but it annoys me that people lose money because of dishonest people like him

Look at the right hand side, it’s not genuine you can see that. It’s a bad cut and crop or a photo of a photo (right hand side looks like a fridge lol!) Genuine holders don’t need to post fake news. Remember that. Just annoys me as people buy off the back and lose hard earnt money whilst he makes a mint Dishonestly of aim i guess

He just blocks you, which to me always means he hasn’t a clue and can’t back anything up so the easiest thing is to block someone. If you look at his picture you can clearly see it’s a cut and paste (look at right hand side, you can see something else there), and the fact it’s about 20 years old, and with high security someone has got that close? Really Shows me he’s just agenda driven like most of them, and I know I’m not the only one to have had this with Chris Oil It’s all games and corruption and he is no different Genuine holders don’t need it post “fake news” unless they have an agenda

LB28, I think that’s most people’s annoyance as why wasn’t enough data issued if that was the case. It should be one of the basics to get right imo It was a very poorly worded RNS which has led to making a bad situation worse All will become clear I’m sure over the next couple of weeks, but it’s hard to add until we know what’s happened and if it’s GL incompetence or FDA issues

Come on wake up, TR1s can be delayed for weeks on AIM we all know that! I’ve seen plenty in my time. It’s corrupt and anyone that thinks different shouldn’t be on aim. I’m not saying he does or doesn’t but why post fake photos in twitter, insinuating things that aren’t there. Those that do that are only after one thing, and that’s not them being “a nice honest chap” GL

Look at the right hand side of the photo, the tool couldn’t even hide up the fact he’s taking a photo of an old photo lol. It’s like watching art attack ;) Anyone that believes this guys tosh is a fool imo Scum

And if you question his tweet you get blocked haha. Most need to wake up to this crock Selling whilst ramping posting 1970s photos and mug punters falling for it It’s those that make AIM the sespit it is GL anyway ;-)

Wouldn’t be by ii at this stage. They wouldn’t take the risk. Likely PIs, traders and interest at these prices, seem few very substantial big buys for me to think anyone other than PIs making a few quid Bwtfdik

$14mil raised back in May, they raise anywhere near that again and this tanks into low single digits No need to mention it at this stage, bod clearly clueless on that front Wait until dust settles, share price raises and makes raise less dilutive and add some fact behind what your using it for They have not helped themselves or shareholders with this at all

https://mobile.twitter.com/chrisoil/status/1096689178417483776 Believe or not, unsure

Agree LB28. As it stands it doesn’t stack up, on the strength of previous trials That said I think they killed this share by stating they need a raise, maybe without knowing the full story from the FDA. We all know the words “raise” on AIM kills a share. Unless a raise was always on the card regardless of approval or not, but again, it’s **** poor communication from the bod on that front. They needed to wait before mentioning raising cash imo until they had details of exactly what it’s needed for, as by just throwing it into the last RNS with no further detai.

Doyezee surely the FDA would have the full data from previous trials and the bod wouldn’t be so incompetent to not issue such data. As you say, it makes little sense at the minute

The more you actually read previous results then more the FDA decline doesn’t stack up, given everyone was 99% sure of approval. So what actually a happened? Thoughts - how can previous data not concur with the FDA response re liver toxicity? - how can everyone be so far off the mark with 99% sure of approval with previous data backing this up? Surely the FDA can’t have it so wrong? - why do we need funds, is this to cover a re trial which means the company knows there are bigger issues to resolve, (which wouldn’t then stack up with previous data) Don’t see how all other data never pointed to the issue the FDA has, everyone including the company and the market/ii seemed to think it was a certainly to be approved, yet the FDA have found something that the data doesn’t show Makes little sense to me but I’m no bio expert

In my opinion, given they need to raise very near term, to me that means they know a new trial will be required. Just my opinion but if it was a cheap easy fix, I don’t see the need to even mention “raise” in this weeks RNS. Whilst I think the drug will come through, let’s nkt forget it was been turned down twice (?) before, so it’s clearly a difficult drug to gain FDA approval with I also bought Friday at 14p and got spiked, but then I did hold only 1500 shares last week but now hold over 10,000 bringing my average down. Peanuts to some here, but a lot to me. My thought is there is no point selling, as clearly the share price now feels rather stable around the 10-12p mark, so imo there can only be upside. The issue I have is the nature of the raise and the associated dilution given where the price currently sits and funds will be needed Q2 ie April onward (not far off). If this does turn out to be an easy ish fix, or certainly not as bad as the market seems to thing, we could have a very quick re rate to around 25-30p, so again, good upside. New trial, we probably won’t be much lower than where we are now after the dust settles. It just means STH have to change tact to LTH as to not realize a loss here. Not many companies get through phase 1 - 3 trials in bio, but as with the likes of Farn, 1,2 are crucial and looking at the data (including phase 3) there is certainly considerable possibility that this is a drug that can go to market. You just have to be patient now and stick them in the bottom draw (I actually bought at 40p initially so still very much down!)

Not on a Saturday ;)

Summary of trial data https://www.sps.nhs.uk/medicines/iclaprim/

Well summed up Ivy. Reading that explanation I have no fear that this will turn around. As most have said, it’s seens toxin levels were addressed previously so I think there is maybe a bit more to this than is mere mortal PIs know at this stage. That said, I do think the FDA have given some Detail to the company as I can’t see they just email you with “not approved”, hence why many are calling for a simple brief response from the company Next 4 weeks will no doubt shed more light Happy to hold at these levels until clarity Could easily see a 10 bagger on good news. Maybe the market has it wrong, who knows

It’s simply institutions de risking, it’s all part of their rules and systems. Often dictated by red tape and what they are and aren’t allows to stay in/invest in. It’s natural when you have a share like this and what’s happened I’m certainly not worried

Contra, problem is, whilst a good idea of the FSHG, some of the genuine ones like yourself an I can not be in the inner circle through circumstances beyond our control, but we have as much care, time, money and heartache (!) invested as others. It was always going to naturally weed out the bad from the board just from the pure fact of people move on to other shares, as theres nothing to see here.

it would just be nice if someone would post every now and then any (no matter how breif) interesting clippets to give the likes of us hope like those in the FSHG group. But hey ho i guess, such is life

it looks like it will end badly today, can now see 9s coming, not holding at all