Member Info for spike912

To be honest CFP I did panic sell as many probably did around 5/6p, wrongly, luckily I decided to buy back in at 5.79p and substantially increased my holding for the same initial outlay, so did recover some losses but not all, as I also held a small amount in AMP from old. 16p ish should see me break even now, either way until clarity it’s not worth selling as you will either make 100% vs lose maybe another 20%. No brainier for now if, like me you were initially in this is the high 30s Only money they say!

Sheltie, many of us have here, and it’s certainly a kick in the nuts, but I wasn’t looking for an argument with anyone, just sharing my own thoughts, shame some can’t be as civil as yourself As I say if they looked at my posts over the last few days they will actually see I’ve been fairly balanced so why someone wants to pick on one innocent simple comment is beyond me tbh Anyone onwards and upwards All the best and GL

Jimzi. ONE post, ONE and it was MY opinion, not fact OPINION, my personal view! Your the one starting a bl00dy debate over one post. My opinion has always been these ii know more than we do, and if anyone thinks otherwise on aim of all places, then in MY opinion they are naive. People talk. Look at good old FRR millions being loaded out the door for months until, whoops, delisted. I’m not saying I am right, I’m not saying others are wrong but I’m entitled to my opinion as much as anyone else on this board The fact you seem to have started some form of debate, well I say debate, over it is rather childish. If you don’t agree to my personal view then fine just say it, as Sheltie did, which I have no issue with, but to jump on your high horse isn’t needed We are all here for the same reasons

Forgot no one can have an opinion or view on these boards anymore (roll of the eyes). It’s called a “discussion board”. Now I don’t always agree with many posts but I always take their comments on board and hear them out, whether I agree or not. That said, if certain individuals actually looked at my posts rather than being lazy and simply reading the last one they would see that my posts are no different to anyone else’s on here. It’s just are to lazy to look before having a pop And Jimzi don’t be a patronizing idiot because you claim be be the next Axlerod End of, move on. Next DISCUSSION

Sheltie, fair enough was just MY thoughts that’s all. As I have said doesn’t mean I am right no more or less than the next poster I juts know how Aim works given many friends in the city work in and within UBS

LB, since when have I been “deramping” if you look at my posts they are along the same line as most people’s on here! Simply debating views and opinions, so not sure of your point to be honest, not sure your reading most of my posts tbh

Yoda as Faron have done? They have run similar subsets due to issues with their p3 trials, after having some issues. Seemed easy to fix over there just time. Fingers crossed it’s the same here. One in respect give what we know and readings Ivy’s posts you’d like to think it’s veey easy and nothing major given previous results and what has actually been done by the company up to this point In another respect you see ii heavily selling out, the company silent and you wonder what some know that us PIs don’t Remember imo the ii will have had sight of the CRL, they are in the inner circle. That’s what concerns me, yes they will see in line with their investing policies but what else have they seen. At the end of the day we are all just guessing at this stage until clarity from the bod

LB I think anyone that thinks the big ii’s know no more than us is rather naive. They are always the first out of the door in my experience Makes no odds now though, we are all waiting for the CRL to come

It also makes no sense for invesco to sell and buy back at a higher price. IF and it is IF any ii come back on board it will be a while away yet due to their own red tape and situation here

Seer, They would not have sold all as it would have totally crushed the SP even more so they will drop feed the rest out to try and keep a stable SP and maximise their return. Invesco will not buy back, they do not have the risk profile to allow to do this under their own ii rules, even more so with the company as it is now. They may buy back but it won’t be soon

Is got nothing with “getting my knickers in a twist” To be honest I couldn’t really care as I’m experienced enough to see through it, and it won’t effect my position here. But I do object to misleading new and inexperienced investors who can’t see through the likes of CO and lose their hard earned cash for them and their families Simply saying newbies beware. Don’t believe what you see on twitter or those backing his claims up like he’s some insider. It’s these people that make Aim the sespit it is For me, I couldn’t care. See right through the guy, but it’s that that costs genuine investors money and ruins aim GL for next week. End of subject

Ok Heidi you keep believing, suppose Santa exists too. If you really believe the photo is real then you clearly need to go to specsavers. He’s scum with agenda, who is being exposed by plenty over the last week to two and the mugs continue to fall for it lol Funny how he can’t say how he got the photo, when it was taken, what is shows or reply to anyone asking mmmm....wait I hear you say...he can’t he would get in trouble....but he can tweet in on social Media haha. Jesus. Wait for his TR1. It will come believe me. Seen it a Million times and aim and still people fall for it I’ve seen better on Art Attack it with my 8 year old cropping on Microsoft Word

He’s hardly going to tell you he’s selling is he. If you speak to him maybe ask him WHY he tweeted a fake photo. Would be interested to see his reply to that one! Sounds like he’s a bit of a hypocrite to me

Ivy, I disagree. They didn’t and wouldn’t have price sensitive information to give anyone the ability for misrepresentation. It’s jusg prudent business practice, no more than other companies raising. Look at aaog, raised before denjo results and that was the big ace card. As it turns out the well failed but they were then funded for the future drills. Imo the CRL should have been issued, let’s face it, it wouldn’t have dropped anymore than it did!

Its likely the company didn’t issue the CRL as it’s lrobably cited a re trail hence the mention of the raise at the same time IMO

See my post Jimzi 08:43

Jimzi suggest you read my posting rather than being lazy. Earlier I made my position, of my holding and buy prices. I’m simply sharing opinion, the bod counted their chickens before they hatched.

SunGod, that wasn’t my point at all. My point was, beware of the likes of CO, and it makes me sick that people get sucked into his s h I t and invest on the basis of it (wrongly but often new and inexperienced people do), and end up losing money whilst he runs off the sunset with his wodge Nothing more than me saying I don’t agree with it and it’s a dishonest way of making a living which is what gives AIM the issues is has. Maybe I’m just a better person at heart GL we will see over next couple of weeks I guess

Problem they have is they have crashed the price, ii won’t now be buying and the raise could be very big indeed If a raise was needed they should have done this around 35-40p whilst excitent and sentiment was with the company School boy error to be honest by the bod imo Maybe we would still have been 20–25p after a raise if they had done that but at least we would now be fully funded for any re trails!

Last those weren’t fake ;) ;-) lol