Member Info for specinvestor99

Re: Soma exploration at best for RRR its modestly positive, not good and definitely not very good

RRR hold 200,000 warrants exercisable at 2.00 So Soma at $4 means a $2 profit or $400,000 one time

That pales in comparison to DRC arb cash also one time, housing profits -annual impact, DRC mining- annual impact, deal on Kenya or RRAL

Proactive had a Canadian interviewer- AB mentioned RRR was looking at the scope of Proactive services

Will RRR be looking for listing in Canada or US?

More words

dedicated, dreamer, visionary, rational, irrational, trustworthy, untrustworthy

too many to list

Interesting to read the different opinions. There are two opposing view points

1-Negative- AB set up this Interview to provide another excuse for a delayed Supreme Court decision or

2-Positive AB set up this interview in anticipation that there would be Supreme Court decision

I am in the second group. thought admittedly as a shareholder I am biased towards that view. Perhaps AB did set up the interview to get the widest possible audience for another delay but that does seem logical

Robins re: judge delay is just an excuse.

I have years of experience in other countries (not the DRC) so there types of delays are very common. So many other countries simply do not have dependable or reliable or predictable justice systems.

My take away from the interview

There two pending events (say within 7 days which be big big news for RRR)

A-cash for 3 factories

B-Arbitration update- Supreme court decision which the arbitrator has been waiting for

On side note I thought AB looked very pleased at the very end. I think AB believes both are comming

The only POW payment with siginficant penalties to file was the Sept payment (See July 2025) which had a "long stop payment' reference

The other two payment are not paid in time then their failure would result in the possibility of POW to cancel the agreement and take legal right. Actions that POW could have taken at any time in the past year for being late. Actions which did not take place. Now that RRR has made a payment and more liquidity from the IC sale plus cash being left over from the sale of the royalty, I doubt that POW would take legal action even if the payment was not make timely

David re your statement "failure to make POW pymt" since this has been confirmed by RNS it is the equilavent to what happens if RRR fails to complete is 2023 audit (which has the same answer-it was done)

Blueboy 1975 not all- I have stated owning RRR share is based on Risk vs Reward

The AI share price prediction illustrates a possible reward (IMO very much overstated). That reward

Key risk IMO is timing since debt is real issue, deal execution is also high on my list of risks

Issues are fluid and a shareholder or possible shareholder should be frequently weighing issues both on entry and exit points on that investment

Those issues are also by factor impact the investor as well. A 21 year old might be tolerant of risk or time frame than say a 85 year old investor.

This is positive for shareholders (terrible for the bashers)

AI Overview

Forecasts for the Red Rock Resources (RRR) share price in 2030 vary, with some AI models predicting an average price around $71.86 (Intellectia AI) or mid-year prices near $77.85 and year-end prices around $47.21 (Traders Union)

These are just AI predictions

Helpful - I agree

you can save this post for future reference--LOL

Helpful re 'cash burn rate: yes google has a very detail example

One point to highlight spending its cash reserves

RRR had no cash reserves prior to getting the one million

Banbury -RRR does not have a monthly cash burn of 300K. This is misleading statement which have repeated for many many months.

Take any month prior to RRR's receiving the one million did RRR ever spend 300k in a cash? NO!!! Why? RRR did not have to 300 k to burn (spend)

I did not check your 300k figures but it probably represents RRR monthly obligations and most of those are not paid but add to the existing debt.

So I will repeat a prior post that I believe that RRR has cash to make the second POW payment.

I accept the fact that RRR has lots of debt (I read the financials). RRR has a debt problem that is at least 3 years old if not longer. Which means RRR has dealt with this debt issue a long time, with creditors (supportive lenders) who continued to provide RRR funds during that time frame. With the very significant progress RRR has shown in the past 2 months those groups are not going to change course and pull the plug on RRR. It will not happen no matter how times you wish or hope that it might happen. Even if you believe they should or that AB is not deserving of that support RRR will continue.

AimDogs- the problem is reality gets in the way. AIM shareholder more so than blue chip shareholders want fast results. Get a property and place into production by Friday. AB/RRR panders to that mentality destroying their credibility in the process

Reality check -via the internet "The average time to bring a new mine into production is approximately

18 years, though this can vary significantly depending on location and project type. The process is lengthy due to the complex permitting and environmental review stages, which can take many years, followed by a construction phase that typically takes 1 to 3 years. "

So for me your list is nothing new.

The 2024 housing MOU was always portrayed as a structure which needed more information. The housing deal with DRC also needs more details. These appear to be very very large deals and those time even more so when dealing with governments compounded by war and other pressing issues.. AB has also stated this.

Only when these initial governmental dealings are completed will progress be faster. Keep in mind most of this was occuring when RRR was broke, very if any cash. Now having received one million pounds there is a possibility of moving faster.

AB x post "we hadn't appreciated scope of their offer"

To me this is a reference to ProActive. If so then this might be an interview to a larger audience and/or part of an ongoing campaign using ProActive. Either of which would be positive for RRR.

To me this does not directly comment on DRC arbitration news, a new DRC or anything else.That;s not say those event are not happening just that AB (rightfully so) careful in his words.

Banburyboy and Aimdogs I took at the financials. There is no income statement but there is a balance sheet with Retained Earnings, which the cummulative amounts of the historical income and losses. So in 2023 the Retained Earnings was 184,197 but in 2024 it dropped to 50,321. The most likely and most common reason for Retained earning to drop is a loss. It dropped by 133,870..

At some point in the past the company was profitable because it shows they owe money for unpaid taxes and have owed that money for at least 2 years. Revenue Canada would not tolerate and would start enforcement action to take or seize assets. So it does appear this company is doing well

Banburyboy re-RRR book loss on sale of royalty it is not a loss of circa 1,000,000 as you stated but a loss of around 500,000 if no value is placed on the warrants

At this point the sale was made and both the one million pounds and warrants were received by RRR. IMO the warrants (for now) and not material. RRR has pending issues which can IMO be very signficant (DRC cash award, DRC new mining property, continued progress on housing JV)

So hopefully there will be news within the next week

The loss figure was readily available since RRR also note its historical cost in its news release in September announcing the sale of the royalty

'

From RNS made by RRR---We believe that the price of c USD1,350,000 plus warrants is a fair one, giving the mine owner a discount to the £1,500,000 at which the asset is carried in our books but accelerating the payment to us and removing our exposure to performance risk of the gold assets concerned.

Helpful Please its too funny. My sides hurt from laughing so hard

The last thing AB said was "Proactive Interview on Wednesday"

Helpful re your comment "stupidity" totally agree AB never should stated a ProActive interview was coming.

Glad to see you agree

Banbury re: ProActive interview. IMO AB was expecting big news that he could talk about.

The ProActive interviews can happen any time. Even now AB could have an interview and talk about the housing JV, what's going, current plans and those mean, as well as future possibilities about more factories and what means. He has done some already via X but ProActive is a different platform and reaches different and probably more people than AB's X feed. AB chose not to do that. Why? I suspect AB had plans to discuss something he thought would but so far has not.

As I already posted I dont like the false start-self inflected wound on credibility-but sxxt happens By now AB should now DRC timing is uncertain

No doubt AB was expecting positive news that he could discuss during the interview. It has not happened. That is not good. Is it just a delay (IMO delays are not good and extended delays are bad) or is it bad news?

Self inflicted damage to an already damaged credibility issue. I dont like this