Member Info for specinvestor99

Helpful just deflection on your part. Your post in question was in reference to RRR's NOMAD being slow to approve RNS.

Again this means you had prior knowledge that RNS was going to be issued so you a RRR insider.-period-full stop

Yes I agree that your being an insider may come and go. It would be interesting for a regulatory body to line up the time frame of your insider status with your posting history, particularly since you dont appear to take many days off from posting.

In Canada/US the swing profit rule (insider trading) is applied for 6 months after the insider information is made public.

I dont know the rules in the UK and perhaps there are no prohibitions. If not illegal it is immoral and unethical. I recognize that those are North American values and it may be that for the UK trading and conduction business with inside information is encouraged and held in high esteem. Countries and values vary.

I state the above because it seems you take pride in your activity and openly boast about it. I simply note that the laws I have to follow are different, my morals and ethics are different than yours I recognize each person is unique and welcome diversity but there are some things that I can not agree with.

I disagree with how you make money and leave it at that

Helpful re your statement "takes a few days to get the RNS out because of what the NOMAD regards as adequate disclosure. For some reason it always takes longer for the NOMAD to agree on RRR's RNSs."

How would you know the timing of how long the NOMAD takes on a RRR news release? Clearly this is evidence that you know news is coming and are definitely an insider

Banbury your opinion has not change despite RRR just receiving one million pounds and a pending IC sale for 300,000 by the end of this December

Plus the emerging details of the new DRC JV

IMO its all about the risk vs reward

The rewards have gotten larger and the risks lower.

The tide has turned but DYOR

Helpful you read but do not understand

My post was about the amount of copper being produced by RRR. How much in 2025 (to date), how much in 2024, how much in 2023

The answer to my question is ZERO

I agree with your point that in copper in the ground has a value. Q How much of that in ground value has RRR realized ? again the answer is ZERO

The issue is can AB/RRR realize that value by a liquidity event (cash for example). The arbitration and legal case within DRC has been ongoing for years.

The DRC arbitration needs to conclude and RRR receive cash in the UK. RRR needs to get the first step done. IMO then and only then will the market place any sort of possible value on a claim against Glencore.

AB will probably be successful in getting more claims in the DRC but can profit ever be sent out or is RRR just building assets for DRC's benefit? Unfortunately that has been the result to date.

The one million pounds was a big step and eliminate severe short term pressure (POW payment, audits etc) and I do believe the tide has turned but the Arbitration must be successfully concluded then RRR will be due for a big leap forward

Helpful great news on higher copper price. Help eveyone out by reminding everyone how much copper RRR produces every year.

DYOR but FYI its ZERO

This may change so stay tuned and watch the tide change

Helpful This is incredible!!!!!!! You just proved that RRR issued an intentionally false RNS

What are the ramifications of this for: RRR,

AB

NOMAD

RRR's independent directos

Perhaps some shareholder would not have sold (like Black estate) would not have sold if they had know this deal had actually closed

Will AIM investigate? cease trade?

I so optimistic that RRR would continue to go up in this UK sell off. This soul crushing news. Will AB extradited back to the UK? stay in DRC? fight these charges brought by Helpful?

W0w look at these sales come piling in

0.035 19,200 Sell* 0.035 0.05 6.72

I guess the seller needed lunch money

Pretty desperate to drive price down

LOL the shares are up today. Canadians share the English language with UK but words have different meanings. Sell off in Canada means shares have gone down.

Since RRR is UK company and trades in the UK and as a shareholder I guess all I can say I hope this sell off continues and the shares go much higher!!!!

AimDogs "he statement "It is not possible to defame someone who is anonymous" is false"

This can only possible IF the anonymous person can be identified, which logic tells us, if they can identified then they are not antonymous are they?

Helpful re Trolls LOL I noticed there is no denial from you. Where specifically does it say anywhere the following

-Patrick has an exclusive

-CDI sale is a done deal

PS I listened to the broadcast and the information on the above points is not there. Lots of people in Canada speak French but perhaps you dont and just thought you BS your way out of being caught (AGAIN)

Grok reports are nice not specific to anyone owning shares in RRR. Lots of gold and copper being produced all over the world but none of it by RRR

Remember the mining equipment held up because of customs duties? the mining people who got sick? assays from termite mounds?

These are reasons why the market wants actual details and not reports from Grok

Nike - I understand what you are saying and I certainly dont know about UK insider rules & regulations

In Canada regulators would make an initial determination, make a charge or allegation and then the person would have to prove they are not an insider

In this case Helpful's position (I believe) would be to acknowledge that he is an insider on some information but not on others. IMO that it is hard argument to make, particularly given his posts that the IC deal is a 'done deal' and that Patrick has an exclusive factory deal for DRC

Most importantly Helpful would have to answer question such as; Why is he posting?

Helpful re your comment "The CDI deal is a done deal." This is not accurate. RRR stated there are a number of conditions including due diligence. It is not a just a shareholder meeting. You may rightly believe the risk on non completion is low or even very low but it is not a done deal.

Your statement directly contradicts what RRR stated. You destroy your own credibility when you make false statements like this. Worse, as an insider of RRR, you also damage RRR's credbility

Helpful -"assembly of houses." The readers here do not have your insider knowledge of the proposed process. Indeed since not even Patrick has 'assembled' a house even Patrick might be surprised that a house has to be built. No doubt the readers of this board will take note of your 'helpful' information and take into account your 'helpful' history of posts on this board

Have you visited a factory similar to the ones being proposed for the DRC? visited the DRC? talked to Patrick? Any actual independently obtained information?

Helpful re housing factory exclusivity I accept (without any substantiation) that Patrick has worked on this for years Unfortunately this also mean that despite working on this for years that Patrick has not built one single home.

exclusivity- I have not seen the factory agreement, have you? RRR makes no claim of exclusivity

I accept that the DRC needs lots of housing. I accept the fact that the RRR JV Housing may expand beyond 3 factories. The current reality is 3 factories, with cash promised by the DRC government (not yet received) with future financing to be derived in lieu of income taxes for mining projects placed into production. Those properties have not been identified so we have idea their size, possible initial production rates, possible net cash flow and most importantly how a property gets financed into production. Personally I am more concerned about those unknowns than the possiblity of expanding beyond 3 factories. Let RRR get the first 3 going with tangible progress

I like the story and its potential but I have heard stories before from RRR. There is a reason why the market has not yet reacted.

Finally and probably most importantly even AB recognizes the need for the arbitration to be sucessful and funds sent out of the DRC. The lesson learned to date by RRR is if you find & develop something in the DRC it can be simply taken away from you.. That reality is not the basis for outside capital doing anything in the DRC. Tails the DRC wins and heads the investor loses.

Helpful re 'exclusive on factories' sorry not believable and I see no public reference that no one else in the DRC is prohibited for a having a factory to build houses in the DRC

Yes I see potential to expand upon 3 factories but IMO issues need to be sorted out first between the JV and government, properties need to be selected, agreed upon and document. As progress is made then it makes sense for both sides to expand it beyond the 3 factories

Just 3 factories and the required mining project(s) are really big

IMO the market first needs to understand how big 3 factories means for RRR AND credibility needs to be shown by RRR that this is REAL

Orslega re 142 factories- but is that 142 total or what is possible for the new JV

Previously AB said he would not expect to get all of it (no frame of reference but perhaps referring to the 142)

Certainly someone could take a multiple of what I showed to get to an even greater potential but right now the unknowns are very signficant

Helpful 50/50 sorry I dont know that Here is what AI says

No, "equal" does not always mean a strict 50/50 split; "equal" in a relationship means both partners are respected and have their needs met, while "50/50" refers to an exact, equal split of contributions that is often unrealistic and can be more damaging than helpful. True balance in a relationship comes from equity, where contributions are fair and flexible, not necessarily identical, with partners supporting each other based on their current abilities and needs.

Additional comment

prior comments have big issue

-no provision for what % of JV might be provided to funding partner

-how much cash is needed to place into production? timing of production etc

Everyone should listen the recent video's from AB/RRR

AB describes the profit from Housing costs, Those housing costs have to be paid by profits taxed from the new propeerties

There is no information on what % that actually is however prior discussions stated it was the equivalent of the taxes which would otherwise be paid

Shown below is the potential reward (very unknown at this point)

housing profits housing costs

$2,000 $14,850

9,000 9,000

$18,000,000 $133,650,000

0.25 tax rate(?) social costs

$534,600,000 Annual mining profits to New JV

$534,600,000 Annual mining profits

($133,650,000) less taxes used for Housing

$400,950,000 Net to JV

$200,475,000 50% to RRR?

please review/comment/analyze

-Did I leave anything out?

-missing something?

-is analysis flawed?

Numbers seem really big

Is this why the 'supportive lenders" are so supportive?

These profits are split with the JV

RRR has an undefined % of these profits

Since higher gold prices we should also post the lower gold prices,

Gold price has really taken a beating in the past week