Member Info for specinvestor99

I still believe the reward outweighs the risk but AB/RRR makes this riskier than it should be.

Since the onset of the Congo issue AB has believed that cash from Congo was 'imminent" which is fine but risk was increased when they began making cash commitments (new properties) as if that cash was actually in hand. Thus when cash was not received as expected RRR had to turn to the markets to raise that cash increasing dilution. Now in theory that dilution can be added to the ultimate damage claim at the international level but that is a different level risk than what we are now facing in Congo

Of course the opposing side in Congo sees how much cash RRR is spending which is one more factor they take into consideration while they delay events in Congo

I agree that Geocamines must have signicant power and influence. Yet RRR was able to get a court judgement. No doubt they could be using their influence to delay the arbitration award.

This boils down to issue of corruption and does the President of Congo want to reduce corruption has he has publicly stated. These are large amounts of money in a very poor country. People disappear over much smaller amounts. The personal risk for RRR people in country would be substantial.

RNS tomorrow? any rumours? I dont hear anything in Canada

TheeDuke- on rollover wouldnt the accrued (unpaid) interest also be rolled over into a new note thus getting compound interest either way a good deal for the note holder and much better than keeping money in a savings account or CD

FYI very little risk in a CLN when the shares are active. worse case is they get 12%, the conversion is just upside

Given the silence I wonder if AB is alive

Is this the right board for RRR?

RRR has multiple approaches to x multiple to its current share price.

Anything happening? as in signing arbitrator award?

Tradedesk- that would be great but the website should have more information. maps, location, other properties, sampling data,

This is the RRR discosure on its Lithium project

"

Lithium

Red Rock is developing a series of lithium projects across Africa with an initial focus on near-term production in Zimbabwe

****

note-nothing on Tin Hill or other applications-------NOTHING

So if RRR wants a higher valuation then it needs disclosure

TD I am not sure why it is so hard for you to answer a question. But this is why I gathered from your response

' you invested in Regency (not RRR) not knowing about Beamont as a NOMAD was a red flag. Now, in 2023, you know Beamont as NOMAD is a red flag

TD please expand upon your comment. So, if having Beamont Cornish as a NOMAD for RRR is a major red flag why did you invest in RRR? Did you just ignore your own red flag?

So sad. Bashers who get called out for false information resorting to personal attacks

What a 'crock'

a basher is someone who defines what words mean and then use those words to bash a stock

Maybe or maybe not- There was specific timing mentioned so the word 'soon' could be late August which is a nothing event.

Whereas if he left this week then it becomes more of an interesting speculation

Exciting times!!!!

Please read your own link it was not questions but " allegations of wrongdoing, including criminal allegations"

Helpful-If I had an % of ALR what would matter the most is cash flow. ALR has a lot to do to measure the contained lithium in the acreage. The prior plan was similar to a quarrying operation, mine what could be seen and then sell it.

Your analysis is based on a faulty premise that there is lithium everywhere. FYI it isnt

When did RRR/AB say they were working on projections? sorry bit lazy today, so I did not look up.

I thought AB said 2-3 weeks. A lot of RRR's problems with disgruntled shareholders are self inflicted By that I mean expectations are set and then not achieved but with no explanation. There is no sense of management just hopping around .

I realize there are too many projects but even in fighting a fire(s) there should be a plan