Member Info for specinvestor99

Banbury correction/clarifcation. The SOMA information, in isolation, is not insider information. however as an insider Helpful's iinterpretation and/or comments about that information or any information could be deemed 'insider' information by virtue of his ownerhsip of ALR and its impact on RRR.

IMO insiders should not post Helpful has agreed that he is an insider and he accepts liability

Banbury Not just me.

Everyone who owns RRR shares should state that they have relied upon Helpful

He KNOWS!!!! He is an INSIDER!!!!

Take Helpful's advice and READ

Helpful great post I will take your advice -continue to hold and look to buy more

I appreciate your insider views

I relied on Helpful's statements made on this board to make my investment decisions regarding my position on RRR

I was aware of his insider position, his duty and obligation to post accurate information

Any disclaimer posted by Helpful to the contrary is waived, treated as null & void by ongoing posts made by Helpful

Helpful You should deliver. You are the insider. Make it happen!!!!!

Banbury thats probably a good settlement offer from Glencore to make it go away and avoid a protracted losing legal battle. Just a cost of doing business for Glencore who still comes out way ahead

Reality check RRR shares are being accumulated, debt converted at .2

get past the noise and realize other (presumably) knowledgeable people are buying

Helpful

You are deflecting

Your response is overly emotional and non responsive to the issue I raised.

Are you Ok?

Helpful

reality check

-you are an insider

-RRR share price is down

IMO you could be held labile to anyone has suffered a loss if they read your posts and simply make a claim -

I purchased RRR shares because of helpful's posts (your disclaimer of DYOR will be ignored). I knew he was an insider and financial professional. I relied on his posts and suffered a loss

Yes you have your defenses but you spend your money while the government spends the taxpayers so even if you win in court you lose money

Helpful- you keep posting that that you have no 'inside information' . This is not true Your opinion is not relevant to the legal definition of 'inside information, which by virtue of your ownership interest in ALR and ALR material impact on RRR makes under the law as possessing 'information information".

This is clear both under US and Canadian law which as you know is based on UK law

Your denials (just like my posts on this subject) have no bearing on how a regulatory agency views your posts

LOL what a joke you should have said $15 million

People with access to money believe AB/RRR are getting closer to success. This is evident by providing cash to RRR in exchange for warrants at .2 which is a 30% premium to the market. This is a great result for company which needs cash (and will continue to need cash) until a liquidity even occurs (Congo, ELEP, Chinese lithium sales or JV mining partner).

RRR, like any other public company, could have always issued more shares even if it had to call a AGM to authorize. That would have been a slam dunk and a process which AB had done many time before

Yep and you can probably guess as to why no US or CDN company did that project

Shoats Creek-water in creeks appear on the surface of the land. Almost all oil or gas wells drill below the water table and thus have to deal with water. Some wells deal with more water than others. In other words it is a common issue and can be dealt with. Although I know nothing of the project I suspect it did have enough gas or oil which doomed the project not the water

Zumore it takes time to get samples, then time to send them to a lab and then more time for the lab to test those samples. It is not as as if the lab is sitting there with nothing to do and then jump into action when those samples arrive. The samples arrive at the lab and then they wait until all the other samples which arrived before them are tested.

Personally I am encouraged by the recent RNS which brings in possible deals with 3rd parties. If a deal is completed then the funding (whatever that might be) will be brought in..

I disagreed with Helpful when he stated the project would be cash flow positive in April.

AB in a video interview stated he had not been to the lithium property further demonstrating he is not hands on.

What is timing for the contract miner? Chinese sales agents? What is reasons now given for Congo delay? What will cause a change? We dont know

WOW AB is in Congo waiting for funds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL you ignore reality -What about the court judgement? an inconvenient truth

How big is "Tin Hil" represents the problem in both buying and selling. There has not been enough work on the property to really know. Consultants on the ground will have 'feel' but ultimately there is no geological model that say xxxx tonnes at y% grade.

For a variety of reasons, including the unknown, IMO the most likely approach is a Chinese offtake coupled with 3rd party mining. This deal (or really any type of deal) would be very significant for ALR/RRR

JR so your advice is to buy AFTER results are in and AFTER all facts are known. curious as to what kind of investment results you get with that kind of approach.

On this side Investors look forward, assess the risk and then investment accordingly. Personbally I have gotten 10x on multiple occasions and my ultimate home run was getting in very early on Diamond Fields- big shout out to Bob for that one