We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
@RD @PL75...I'm sure that others as well as myself have been more than grateful that Ophidian was kind enough to share his estimated timeline with the board, even if you two self appointed cheerleaders did not. I'm fairly certain that many other investors may not have been aware of the length of time the the full process of bringing a test to market could actually take, and therefore Ophidian's timeline would have helped calm a few nerves over the last few months.
Credit where it's due. It's a pity that you cannot both be a little more dignified in your acknowledgement of his efforts to help all.
No doubt he's decided to end his attempts to share his knowledge thanks to posters like yourselves who somehow see other posters as a threat to your BB dominance.
And on the subject of gratitude, well done PL75 on your own continued positive attitude to the majority of what you post. Long may it continue.
Calm down everyone. If you sign up to RNS from Vox Markets, they will often repeat announcements of any 7am RNS, and they did this again today at 08:56...in fact, they actually did it twice so it looks like another RNS when it's just a repeat of the initial one. LOL
@daitom, did you just receive that reply today or was it a week or so ago as i seem to recall someone posting very similar recently. I had emailed Cheka as well but have had no rely to date. Either way, end of month narrows down the possibilities, so many thanks for the info.
Looks like clients of CANACCORD GENUITY GROUP INC seems to have increased their interest in Simec Atlantis. Quite an endorsement.
I wonder if jmjones is still trying to fill their order from yesterday:
'very strange buy trades showing up at 12.88 and i still haven't got a fill on buying 150,000 shares at limit of 13.15"
Should get filled if the SP is allowed to move by the MMs, but it does seem that there is an effort being made to stem the rise.
@Chengdo4, i'd agree to an extent, however you've also pointed out something more important....if i feel that i do not have enough expertise or knowledge to make my own contribution then i'll refrain from cluttering the board with nonsense.
I think the volume of recommends to my post tells it's own story. 59 recommends kind of suggests that I am not alone in my thoughts. Especially when compared to PL75's sarcy reply...which has 6.
Anyway enough from me.
I’ve not managed to get much time to keep up with recent posts here. Thank goodness for that. No idea what others think, but the last couple of days has descended into a state of utter nonsense.
I used to enjoy reading posts by the likes of Ophidian, Richken and a few others, but the utter c r a p that’s replaced some genuinely good posts has ruined this board. It would be bad enough if it was just deramping, but it’s not, it’s just useless c r a p.
Looking forward to all the derogatory messages from certain individuals, but suffice to say I’ll most likely not be on here to read them
Interesting thread to follow, but i'm curious €RorkesDrift, what are your thoughts on what are the most important factors in a clinical validation protocol. I understand much of what Ophidian is driving at but am doubting that you do. It would be interesting to understand your counter position