Member Info for smickster

Add has a simple problem with being challenged like he is some sort of higher opinion here.

I mentioned many times it was your scenario that I said was way off and yet you state about it being your opinion.

You also said the value of your scenario was $2bn yet it clearly says $1.5/2bn I mean what's 0.5bn between friends eh.

Now you insult both myself and Jack who are 2 different people.

I'm afraid your sounding more and more like quady.

Maybe you should stop interacting with him as you seem to have picked up some pretty bad habits.

And for the record I think Jack's a top guy.

Anyway I accept your apology as your weren't aware that your being a d1ck this morning

I wasn't suggesting that was your opinion Rbm just purely that you backed his opinion which I had dismissed.

Nothing emotional, irrational or rude about it.

Rodney I'm not being unfair here simply challenged an outcome which has little credit and up pop the multi logins.

And the only thing I see trying to be canceled is my opinion.

I find it laughable that you support such blatant shenanigans.

Of course we should listen to Rbm who decided to login in and back up Add having not been on the solg bb until recently.

Your making what little credit add has disappear like the 30p pipe dream.

Very familiar style Rbm, maybe more than 1 login.

Add,

I simply challenged your possible outcome with the information we have.

No one is getting excited and if anything you've not accepted that the facts provided make your possible outcome complete tosh.

Let's see what next 6 months bring.

Fort, I think you have hit the nail on the head there.

You could also see the names you mentioned aligning with PI and digging in for a proce closer to nav.

I'm pretty sure the list of main players here won't accept 38p and the list know they can call on pi if such a derisory offer is required to be shutdown.

Pi were quietly holding and not selling and waiting for the tide to turn.

SeanT suggested that pi may hold up to 40%.

Personally I think that's a high amount but wtfdik and he is more likely to have good reason to give that number out.

I'm trusting the board as I have no choice but don't think a large holding like that has no significance here.

Our board will be well aware what's needed to satisfy the majority and I'm sure that's what's being relayed to Jiangxi hence the non starter offer of 26p.

Miss G ,

That works both ways and I firmly believe we stick together and keep the speculation that anything under £1 is unacceptable.

Good day to you

Add, I do yes if we stick close to a fee of our bigger holders NM and a few funds.

You also need to look at what you wrote as you suggested $1.5bn which I make about 38p.

It's that mindset that we have little significance here that will play apart in us getting sold to cheaply.

Nav is £1.65 so a sale price that's linked to it .8 or 1.0 or discounted or whatever you want to do with it, it all add to more than 30p.

Let's stick together and listen to our board and trust they don't try and pull a fast one

Interesting view to play down the value of private investors considering that's what you are.

My personal opinion is PI play a big part as they align with many of our bigger holders and considering PI have a considerable chunk here im quite suprised you feel they are not important.

We have been told what fair value is and paid millions to get these reports together.

My guess is by first ore 2028 and an sp way above 85p by 2030.

All pure speculation

I'd rather see it sold but after 12 years here I'm not about to agree it should be sold for 30p, plain ridiculous from you I'm afraid.

We already trimmed the pfs to make it look cheaper.

Fair value is now the only option.

The time for picking this up cheap was 50/60p pre covid.

Add, that's absolutely nonsense outcome.

Close to full value or jog on.

First ore is not that far away and I'm happy to wait for full value.

Cough up or move on, too many games with these so called big boys.

jiangxi need at least another 40p(65p+) to be taken seriously.

bhp won't be taken seriously as the lack the substance to get things across the line.

han**** or fortescue need to come to the party.

Grundles,

My feeling for a long time was 1, 2 and 3 offers unchallenged and this goes for 40/50p.

If someone else comes in who knows.

Personally I hope the board rejects anything under 60p as they are taking the mick coming in at 26p.

Hope we are strong enough to hold out.

Gla it's been a slog

Left it a bit late didn't you Henry.

"Frankly in current markets, it's hard to see the right combination of the commodities that we like, the asset quality that we like, at a price where we can still unlock attractive value for BHP shareholders,” Henry said on a results call.

Medi, clocks ticking on the Franco/Osisko buy back.

Michael, you missed the £1....of your target.

Easy mistake but it's £1.35 to £1.50

That's big big news. IP and Pbow almost in agreement :-)

Come on DanV, let's celebrate with an Rns