Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Thank you.
The reason I asked that question was that they had already done one well so absolutely knew about the high pressure and they did design the second well but still couldn't cope with the pressures. I'm guessing this is very common till they get the correct balance if that the correct term.
That's more like the Paul I remember from 2 years ago. Interesting that they could have some leverage when upping the volume at Cascadura. $14 million a quarter when Cascadura comes online then all the infills "wow" If I have got that correct . Then Royston if all good. So are we better off below $75 a barrel due to how Trinidad tax the oil as above is 18% more . Cascadura will be producing 1500 bopd from those first 2 wells. Then as highlandmatt says all the rest. What a step change just on Coho let alone Cascadura. It's bloody huge going into next year and beyond. Would still like them to drop another well at Coho first as everything now in place .
Paul's presentation will be taken with a pinch of salt I'm afraid. Just not capable of doing anything within timeframes. Said he would keep us informed on Coho commissioning but had absolutely zero news in over 5 weeks.
Is Paul the man to take the company forward which I'm beginning to think he is not.
I’ve now filtered BEETEE,heavy,smasher,bottom_feeder and oracleofoldham and I suggest all regular users do the same.
Denying these nutters the oxygen of publicity is the only way to stop them taking this site over to push their pro strike agenda.
yes I have my faults but a nutter is a new one to me. We are also allowed opinions which is exactly what you are doing is it not for god sake.
This board was my fist post on lse and i know many investors here and have often talked about how good the company is with them as I will with fleccy and the rest. Just because I work for them and we have a grievance about pay does not mean I don't care about this company because I very much do.
It is great to look at things from a different angles because that's how you learn things is it not. I hold nothing against anyone wanting to make money because we're all here for that.
Would it not be incredible boring if we all just agreed on everything in this company is spot on .
If you wish to call me a nutter then that's up to you but i find it interesting how different people think about certain situations including you especially now you have judged me without know my past here. I've done hundreds of posts here over the years compared to yourself and discussed many telecom topics with many investors.
Filtering some investors just because you don't wish to listen to anyone that doesn't have the same opinions as you. Does that make me a nutter or you. Atb.
Government is not a business. BT has to re-invest in order to stay competitive, and they need to keep some money to survive in case things go wrong for a while. They cannot spend their entire profit on salaries.
How interesting you should say that when they paid out 54% of those profits to shareholders. So cut the dividend would be a start don't you think so the workforce can get a fair deal and they can invest more in the network.
So binmen and those upto £39000 will get a £1925 pound consolidated pay rise if the work force north of the boarder agree with the government saying can't afford it but that's what they have offered, while BT/Openreach workforce got £1500 from a company that made £1.3 billion pound profit but gave £700 million to it's shareholders and a pittance to its workforce.
Let's all kneel before the great man for taking a nice 32% slice because he has such a stressful job ( get the violins out chaps) compared to engineers because apparently they don't have stress and only work 9 to 5 .
Get real for God sake, every one on this board knows people have been complaining for years and years that these people are being paid extortionate money and 99% of the UK would agree with me.
I had a director out with me and another engineer. He came to the site and within 20 minutes 7 local managers turned up . I've never seen a man lose it with them like he did telling them in no uncertain terms to go .
He didn't want them talking crap to him as he was out for 2 days with us. He came out to see an idea 5 of us had but wanted to see for himself instead of managers giving him sporadic information. He was Bright as a button and a fantastic sense of humour and amazed he had all the gear to get stuck in.
By the end of the 2 days he was knackered but had got all information needed from us and how it worked.
He said to us that it's not just those above trying to save money and new ideas but a collective effort from all and one just doesn't work without the other.
Certain things was brought back in house is all I will say.
If you think for one second it's just the top brass that come out with the ideas on making money and saving money then BT/ Openreach are in serious trouble.
Wow how short sighted some on here are .
Handymandy you don't have a clue how it all comes together and the union together with the company has worked for decades to make it a success. If it hadn't you wouldn't be invested here hey. Unions will be here long after you and me are in the ground no matter what you put on here.
Your insults as usual are childish. If you wish to roll over when times are hard then good for you, but I'd rather stand up and try my hardest to make things better for my family and others
Thank the lord we are not all like you .
I have worked for the company long enough to understand what's happening as I'm part of it.
The I've been told brigade is just hear say and gets exaggerated by people like yourself.
Least with fleecy and others we can agree to disagree. The company is great but sometimes it needs a kick up the backside. Just watch out the divi doesn't get cut.
Share price opps down again.
Do you work for BT / Openreach and understand how the fault/ jobs allocations through the systems to each engineers ability. Many many engineers are not multi skilled anymore and could require 1/ 2/ 3 to finish a job especially if the fault is UG. They will not train up to that level as it cost the company to much.
Hence you can't reduce faults over sustained periods with reduced staff levels.