Member Info for Slinkyfink

I introduced a mate to the company and today he decided to take the plunge. In his words "Pulled the trigger at .1825 each proud owner of almost 33000 shares".
That was a bit before 4pm and his aren't showing yet either.

That is one hell of a lot of blue for a SP that is down on the day so far. Just goes to show the appetite of PI's to soak up those large sells. I'm really looking forward to seeing how this moves once those large sells dry up.

Going by the RSI indicators we are well into oversold territory. I expect a bit of a bounce now.

I scraped together some bits of cash in my ISA and regular share account and managed to get two buys in at 17.5!
Bet they show up as sells...

It doesn't seem to have shown up yet. Think it will show up as a 'late' trade?

Yeah, great price you got there. Congrats!

Been topping up, or just got around to filing for TR1?

... and about what?

Considering the sea of red across my watchlist, it's nice to have something in blue! Sigh... if only I'd kept some powder dry to average down a bit at this level.

SP rose quite sharply over a fairly short time period, inevitable there would be a pullback at some point. I guess the general market sell-off has compounded this, and due to the sharp drop it's also triggering some panic selling.

Extract from above article:
"redT energy, the UK-based energy storage infrastructure specialist, will showcase its cutting-edge vanadium flow machines."

And this is why I love the this BB. Insights which are straight up & factual. Many thanks @Alfacomp.

And thinking some more... and throwing something balanced into the mix. What would it take to retrofit something like a coal station to become a gas station?

Just thinking... there is another big factor in all of this. It's not just about building a massive power station, it's about creating smaller grid solutions which are servicing a smaller 'user'. Whether that just be a remote town or a stand alone company. eg mine.
All I'm really coming up with - beyond solutions that utilise natural features, eg. hydro - would probably involve some sort of battery storage?!

Hoping there are some in this forum who may be able to give some insight into the build time for the various different types of 'cleaner energy' solutions in relation to levels of power delivery, eg: clean coal, CCS, gas-to-power, hydro, renewables, battery storage and nuclear.

In my mind battery storage in conjunction with things like solar or wind power, must be quicker and cheaper to build than something like a coal/gas/nuclear station? Not just from the perspective of time spent engineering the blueprints through to fully built, but also the ability to easily scale thereafter.

This is something that I think would be front-of-mind for those doing the energy solution selection. There is now a real sense of urgency in the world around this, but this would be obviously offset by benefits of slower to realise options, which offer greater energy delivery in the long run (eg. nuclear). Obviously these all have different risk and green credential profiles.

I also got a response email about a week before the AGM. In my email I asked various questions mainly around comms.
Bulk of response from GS: "The company’s clients are institutional investors that appreciate a certain level of discretion. So for obvious commercial and regulatory reasons, we are very careful of the information that is released into the market. In the meantime, we focus on the business that creates value for all shareholders."

"These goals include ramping up solar and wind power; integrating higher shares of those sources into the grid; ensuring greater participation by communities, small companies or new market entrants; and maximising the socioeconomic benefits of renewables, including job creation."

Those lines fits BMN's profile perfectly!

Been fairly slow on the volume front as we await the 'news', but todays trading looking positive even if the SP isn't really moving (yet).
Buys are double the amount of sells.

# Trades 24
Vol. Sold 798,425
Sold Value £14.77k
Vol. Bought 1,770,668
Bought Value £32.76k

Hey all, I've noticed that we've ended up having loads of threads created with the same title, ie. replies are being added as new threads. Could we reply under the same thread rather than create a new one with the same title to keep things a bit more ordered? Not sure but maybe it's because some people are using the the 'message view' which just shows all messages as posted, opposed to the 'thread view' which groups all replies under a particular thread?

This one is easier to understand and was interesting because of the cost reduction of the membranes:
https://phys.org/news/2020-02-nanomaterials-derived-cellulose-renewable-energy.html