Member Info for SlamDunk1

No, confirmed that the person has been at Synairgen for a long time - a very inactive profile on LinkedIn that has just appeared.

They have also removed several high earners off the books - Gearing, Hennings, Francis reducing days etc.

Well we do know they were buying around the £2 mark at one point and we also know that after their own analysis, they deemed it a high probability of a successful trial, leading to a 10x increase in valuation. If only...

Mani

"Nothing more to add from me until we see the results RNS..."

That lasted all of 5 seconds.

Tommy,

I wasn't at the agm so can't give my personal opinion but would be interested to know from those who were there whether those slides were well received or more of a time/content filler.

Apologies Tommy, you must have missed my post on Reddit saying I don’t agree with that.

Anyway, let’s leave it there and if you want to green box me that’s fine, I’ll continue to share my new snippets when they come around.

Tommy,

I rate your research and wish you’d post more, I have stated that before.

I have a problem with people calling others traders when they have no idea and are in no position to judge - that’s all!

Let’s call it a day shall we!

Tommy,

I just don’t like the way you talk to others but yes give your opinion, it always seems to be the last!

So it’s a strategy for traders Tommy?

And as the owner of this chatroom you have decided that Spacman is a trader?

This sounds like making an assumption which you are so wildly against 99% of the time.

Erode shareholder confidence for what reason Fruits, please explain?

Yes Tommy, discussion is the point of a chat board. However, that is a whole lot different than trying to dismiss another’s point completely.

Jint,

And that’s the great thing, everyone is allowed a different opinion and some welcome that more than others!

Tommy,

One of your many assumptions on the trials SNG have in their sights might also be right, at that point we will live happily ever after!

I wonder if people who make investment decisions based on a couple of posts here and there should be invested at all.

Its also irrelevant Tommy because they have a running trial, we do not.

That response proves my point really but yes, let’s leave it there.

Tommy,

If it was your view no more no less then that would be fine - my point was particularly around your dismissive tone which is fairly regular towards others.

I also don’t agree with anyone else being dismissive or inferring something that they simply cannot know (shill in this instance).

Tommy,

You are a great poster who shares lots of useful research but you need to stop acting like your opinion is the only one that matters and/or is right. People are allowed to feel aggrieved by:

- The 'perceived' lack of progress and i put perceived because we don't know as they wont tell us

- The lack of communication which is fact due to a lack of

If a post currently has 19 up votes or whatever you want to call them, there's a good chance that it might not be total nonsense. Some elements farfetched maybe, but to dismiss something the way you do is wrong.

I expect progress is being made in the background and one thing consistent is that Synairgen do prefer a meat on the bones RNS. However, if you repeatedly say you will do something (improve comms as an example), its not unreasonable for us to expect them to stick to that.

Great few posts which don't include the usual last sentence insults/aggression - keep it up.

I seem to recall that early in the pandemic when platforms trials were the hot topic, companies applying to be included needed to show that they had the manufacturing / financial capability to bring the product to market once approved. if they didn't have this "plan", they wouldn't be considered for the trial. Which makes sense to avoid wasted resource on drugs that wouldn't reach the intended place.

In my head it may even have been Chris Witty who discussed it although i cannot remember so someone may be able to help me out on that, but to me, financial capability is a pretty relevant subject to all parties.