Member Info for Skwizz

Hi Boovie!
*Waves
:)

Also, GL.
Hope you and all other holders/traders see profit here.
Just don't try to deceive.
:)

Yes charge, just to help you out; the SP has risen 2.34% from where it last closed.
But the "spread" is 4.69%, meaning anyone buying in this morning would already be under water.
So 'fantasy' or otherwise, no traders upset quite yet.

You should try it, btw.
Rather more being made by traders here over the last five and a half years than holders.
;)

"If Skwizz, Mirasol, Penguins, Ibug etc etc tell you they will need to raise billions via shareholders they are talking out of their a ss (as usual)."

*UKOG telling you.

Simple Basic Math's.
You should try it.
UKOG have given you all the data.

and managed less than £2.5m in the bank, last report.

1) what's he done with it all?
and
2) see above.

"Us"?
Lololol.
If it walks like a duck; Quacks like a duck; Smells like a duck; Flies like a duck; Has the education of a duck; It's a Malvolio.
Come back when you're properly armed.
:D

Reading your wacky contributions, and taking them all together, I think that there's sufficient reason to believe that you may actually be a bit 'backward', Malvolio.
I now regret baiting you as, with the difference between us, it could be seen as bullying.
I'll wait for somebody who is better equipped.

Currently this is just a Ponzi scheme.
One day Sandercon will vanish after a knock on his Surrey home at 04:00 one morning.
And you'll finally realise you've been had.

The point, my dear Malvolio, is that they've had to repeatedly borrow to take on any of their plans.
They never finish the job and only take on new projects and then have to borrow more by re-diluting already diluted shares.
Sandercon promised three years ago that they would stop that and that all future projects would be funded internally..
HELLO!
They haven't been because they can't be.
After all this extra cash has been raised, at the cost of LTHs, there has been (and probably is) NO product.

I don't side with anyone here.
I only evaluate information and sentiment provided.
...and take the p*ss out of the foolish.

Thanka, Mirasol.
That's even more than I thought.
Interesting when you see someone trying to ramp two placings this year as being a successful strategy, forgetting all the others they've had and blown over the years.
;)

Incidentally, the reason I'm flipping BP for small margins is that it allows for trading to be more frequent.
Although I'm only making small profits each time, they all add up.
Yesterday I bought and sold it twice for just 4%.
But over the last two years my returns would have been 150% even without trading (bought at 200p).
With trading, even such low amounts, I've more than doubled that.
And it's BP.
I treat their shares as extremely small risk (for now), which allows considerable margins for trading errors.

Depends more on the spread (difference between the buy and sell prices).
Platforms manipulate the spread so they can rake a bit of profit for themselves.
The lower the price goes the greater the spread.
There is a point at which the distance between the two is not worth the risk.

UKOG is a risky bet so some may want a greater return than the spread allows.
A situation I have found myself in for some time.

As another example, close to my heart, BP (which I have been trading a good deal this year) has a much lower risk.
It is possible to flip it for very small margins.
If you do it often enough that may be more worthwhile for you.
I have redeemed more from flipping BP this year than I have from UKOG for some years.

But UKOG is AIM, which has no stamp.
While buying BP attracts a 0.5% stamp levy.
You need to ensure your rewards allow for that.

GL.

That would include Malvolio himself and we can't have that.
;)

Last thing I want to see is UKOG going broke.
I have friends in it and still holding from around 1p.
I told them not to but there you go.
However, my not wanting it to go broke will not be enough to prevent it.
It will also not be enough to turn it around.
It is simply what I feel will be the most likely result from the information available.

I would love to be proven wrong and see some idiot with even the slightest more ability than Sandercon come along and make a success of it.
I will not be able to take the profits from that as I am not an LTH.
I hope to still take some from quick trades.
I think my view is realistic, yours is fantastic (and very amusing, bearing in mind all the facts on the table).
:D

Oh, and this one,

"- Millions in the bank (2 successive placings this year) tick"

LMAO!
He sees them as good things.

lolol

No I was thinking of this one, "placings have generated millions this year".

;)

has UKOG raised capital through borrowing (banks or other institutions) and placings since 2017?
Just wondering as one particular expert seems to be promoting the last one as a positive thing.
I think it was more than five times, but would like to have someone who can remember more reliably comment.
Just trying to understand if it ever becomes a positive the more times it happens, as he seems to think.
;)

LMAO!
I was going to be "banned" a few weeks ago.
It's his blinkered insistence about absolutely everything that I find so amusing.
:D

"ells_valexpert
Fri 18:31
Posts: 1,331
Price: 0.064
No Opinion
I can't be bothered anymore. You're all loons."

Apparently you could be bothered after all.
So you lied.
Which makes you a liar.
Again.
Lololol.

Although, personally, I find him to be misleading and a proven liar (by his own posts), his naivety and immaturity is also rather good entertainment and can even be fun when its' particularly moronic.

"90% of Malvolio's posts have been on Skwizz; Ninetails; Brillo; Penguins; Ibug; Mirasol; etc etc etc. and are all critical of their more realistic view for the future of UKOG, based upon current available information, not desire or fantasy, in the last 30 days.
Say no more.
If you want to listen to this troll and woke LSE continue to let the lunatic asylum run the board, well you have failed LSE."