Member Info for skid35

Mickey. I know you don't actually believe what you have written - you've been here about 18-24 months.

It hasnt been recapitalised, it hasnt been restructured - just a bit more cash for DL's $20k a month to laugh at shareholders. You must have said this about 5 time now after each raise.

ENET really hasnt got anything, coming from years in US Tech companies I assure you if there was any value in ENET it would have been picked up.

Finger - it not just the discussion boards.

The RNSs contain very deliberate lies from the board i) follow on business from existing customers which doesn't materialise ii) statements of trials etc leading to future near term orders iii) now these have gone just pie in the sky stuff on ASICs etc. The revolving rubbish in iii) was just the ENET boys making stuff up after a few beers, without even any indication from a customer they were in the slightest bit interested.

I still remember DL telling a group of PIs they were working with Cisco and Juniper (if true even then would have sent the share on a filtronic rise), one of the PIs used a contact in ENET to find out is was all completely made up.

All board members should be barred from holding any future board positions and fined, city institutions should receive fines 10x what they have received in fees. All ex CFOs should have their letters removed

Exms, under uk law both fraudulent and wrongful trading.

It’s amazing that they continue with the line “working capital” which is what you need for stock / debtors when you actually sell something.

An rns in the last two years should have come with the directors not taking any pay, this is purely for DL and a few mates to carry on taking salaries - the level of which is based on a company with $10-20m in sales actually doing anything.

Every rns starts with the lie “a leading supplier”. Stop the gravy train, vote against.

I don't mind to opposing views based on differential views of a company by posters who good knowledge, avocet just seems like a prepubescent teen.

No way they will get a top float price on parameta with its current performance. Best wait for a couple of decent quarters of double digit yoy growth and hope the tech sector is still doing well.

Good to see the update today. Again "orders" needs to be split out between renewals and net new business to make sense of this metric, but seems positive. Near term hopefully get cns back above 10p and stay there, ridiculous current share price.

Thought this backlog build (and words on further similar opps) would have had more of an impact on the share price today.

Assume with the Trump shutdown most the potential PFAS opportunities are just stuck, would be great to see some follow on DoD orders which might have more of an impact if they are seen as a more steady, recurring source of income.

So a company that has taken its "products" to every possible customer who have then rejected them even after trials, customers it did have have either thrown it out or not even started, and ENET suddenly becomes one which will strike a deal.

Having met DL he is delusional and arrogant, and a liar. Having worked in large US tech for 35 years in companies which have bought about a companies a year it is clear ENET really has nothing to offer the market.

Moneyweek.

If anyone has listened to jolly hockey sticks somerset-webb on any podcast you'll realise she really hasn't a clue, just repeats what she's heard from other people without understanding it.

Looking up the definitions of wrongful.and fraudulent trading in UK law. I can't see how ENET are not in insolvency at the moment.

Spectral. They have never provided details on what their real contracted "order book" is. Most appear initial small contract and unenforceable "commitments".

Options are fine. The remuneration committee here is very poor, it is a good read in the annual report and then the concepts are thrown out of the window.

The rewards here heavily skewed to the bod not shareholders.

So as well as the very large cash bonuses we can now see the options.

I don't think investors will see much from the Siemens contract, seems to being shared amongst the board.

Just thinking of them waiting for the ping of the one email they get a day to get excited.

Having a chairman on an exec rather than non exec salary really is astounding, I suppose part of the remuneration committee mutual back slapping.

NAV includes cash as well as investments.

Although they don't do it, they should take the cash from both the NAV and Market Cap to give the discount on the investments only.

Vinniw, mathematically that makes sense but doesn't happen in practice. You just needed to look at arix beforehand, or ipo even now.

Opti should have been in a position years ago with a self supporting portfolio of deals at different stages of lifecycle, the ones from five years ago now throwing off cash for investment in early stage opportunities.

Comparitives not competitors, b##### autocorrect.

Interesting they just say profit before tax and don't put a number on it. Competitors used for last year are selective and one off.

With the margins on the Siemens deal they really should be making hay, hope it doesn't go their heads and they just squander it.

Post taken down very quickly today.

You would have thought they would have better things to do than monitoring this site on minute by minute.