Member Info for Skelly85

If no one knows the cost of extracting tin and tungsten.

If noone knows whether tin or tungsten would even get through an EIA.

If no one knows if they'll get a mining permit for Tin and Tungsten.

If no one knows how many more years of time delays it will take to compile all of those things, adding to an already ridiculous capex, which in itself will increase with inflation.

Then they are nothing more that increased risk factors and if anything increasing the financial risks, increasing the time risks, increasing local objection risks, increases environmental risks.

Not that any of these things matter really. Because they aren't in the DFS lol.

LOL,

Angry little man who can read the DFS and see there ARE NO TIN OR TUNGSTEN CREDITS so they will not be a factor in either the fair value takeover price of EMH, nor the share price of EMH.

There are no tin and tungsten credits you moron. Read the DFS.

Lol,

Gruntmachine, do you realise that when a product is not in the DFS, it will not be used in calculating the fair value" of EMHs share of Geomet when CEZ roll out the low ball takeover bid.

The price of tin and tungsten are irrelevant when there has been no study to confirm capex or opex of building the facilities to extract it. Or if its even possible!

You might as well include the price of uranium. There's no DFS for that either. Actually, why stop there, let's include avocado oil!

Spoint is, youre still happy to read about him everyday though aren't you.

Yet I bet the likes of greenmachine open up the bbc news website and read all the top articles normally doing nothing more than bashing Trump, loving every word of it. Then come here to complain about the exact same thing happening to EMH.

Jemesas view is to just way whatever BS he can think of to ramp EMH. Doesn't matter if its a complete lies or swapping reasoning back and forth from day to day. He will vomit whatever rubbish he can to distract potential investors from the reality of how much of a gamble EMH has always been.

Yea, Jemesa/Fingersxd, this whole story of imminent news and director buys has been played several times over the years, and every time it was BS. Rinse and repeat.

Recurring early every year for several years.

Easy to check. Didn't make it up.

Every makes up that Im making stuff up.

Remember I made up that EMH doesnt have assets or loans so they couldn't sell them or refinance for a cash call if one occurs. Yea, tha5 turned out to be accurate too.

Lol. And thats the part you want to be worried about?

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EMH/directorpdmr-shareholding-a6q0tx55vp7xqrv.html

Interesting.

That American Director of EMH who normally has a recurring buy every March hasn't bothered topping up in 2026.

Because I dont want to.

Does anybody know how many of the shares the CEO holds that were actually bought?

Quite presumptuous.

Nice to hop over to Oz every once and a while to read an intelligent conversation about EMH.

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/ann-clarification-of-incorrect-geomet-report.9111940/page-2

Str9ng bias. Lol.

Who doesnt have a strong bias when reporting projected prices???

EMH? Do you think their DFS numbers were not strongly biased?

Reminds me of the DFS being rushed out on ASX nd then having to be pulled back for falsified numbers.

I wonder when they will actually have their unanimous vote to provide funding for Geomet, since they do actually need funding.

Interesting price range Bizzler.

How viable is Cinovec at those prices?

No one is debating if these things are standard process.

The question is, where will EMH get their share of the money from when they have no cash in the bank and no assets to leverage.

Dilution is absolutely a possibility, and having people say it isn't by lying about EMH having land to sell and loans to refinance doesnt make it any less of a possibility.