RE: rns14 Aug 2019 11:23
Certainly will be sticky, they'll be wanting to hold for production income, that's the entire point!
Those brazenly forecasting huge discounts to CEZ for shares seem to fail to realise how counterproductive that would be for both parties since they would harm the overall share price. It'll be a simple case of a volume-weighted average price less a discount. On such a huge number of shares it won't be a gigantic discount, this doesn't happen in the real world. I get that people think the government has leverage to use permissions to 'bully' EMH into a huge discount for the raise, but ultimately they need the share price to go up, and buying at a sensible discount will add huge market confidence and immediately send the shares soaring. Some absurd bottom-dollar would tank the shares they'd just bought. What's more, they still need EMH to get access to the mine, they have no other legal recourse, so even if they carry out the implied 'threat' and slow down everything to a crawl, ultimately there is no winner there, including them. EMH are not without leverage here - if the state wants to realise the riches of this mine, they have to play ball. Simplistic views about 'communist nationalisation' really are missing even the most elementary modicum of subtlety here.