Impairment charges8 May 2023 20:39
I have always been suspicious of the business model of CNEL as they differ considerably to business in the UK and elsewhere that when a company signs a contract they pay in advance for materials and fabrication and therefore protect the company should the client subsequently not pay their bills or cancel the contract. This is standard business practice but it appears CNEL effectively gets paid for materials in arrears meaning that we can only support deals relative to the amount of cash we have. if you read the 2022 results we had about 50m RMB / £5.5m of impairment losses that roughly translates to products shipped to clients that were subsequently not needed or shipped back and then independently valued at fair value and written off. That is crazy how CNEL operate as it opens us to massive financial risk. clearly any kit sent back from the client has almost no value as it will be bespoke. It maddens we have big impairment of £5m when the company is not willing to even buy back $500k of shares, worth less than 10% of their incompetent management? However it has also got me sadly thinking, based on slippery deals the bod got up to, that if you were up to no good a great strategy to get money out via the side door is a cosy deal with an end user to agree simply credit certain invoices and call them "impairment" and have a nice split of proceeds on the side? i hope not but sadly the board were caught red handed, albeit they fudged a way out, but someone explain how they can have £5m impairment charge in one year? Our retained profits have been hit hard and i worry the board are up to their tricks using a different strategy away from the auditors arms.