Member Info for Siggins

I assume you are short tonynorstrum?

Tony...you know stas better than me...are you the same person then?

you conveniently forgot why stas suddenly appeared out of nowhere on this site with his charts...he just woke up one morning,threw a dart and of all the shares it could land on ,it happened to be panr...and so he did a chart...and then more charts..

Stas has switched sides many times..anti panr..pro panr..anti panr....and his reason for first appearing here was laughable....who does he think hes kidding

Marmaris..i hope you point that out to them in the webinar and ask why they are paying so much..ps i agree you are in the ball park for a an offshore jack rig but a semi sub would be way way way more than that

Brombarb

as i said i was paraphrasing from memory,but corrected that when i read the rns again..i am long and 100 pct want there to good news on monday,but the line that i quoted earlier[below] was a worry to me as i took that as requiring additional appraisal beyond the current flow test...if you can tell me that i have stupidly misinterpreted that i would be delighted and would be grateful if you could explain what they actually meant by that line.

Apologies... i was paraphrasing from memory i thought..just read it again and the rns said"discuss next steps in further progressing appraisal efforts"....i took that as the meant additional appraisal beyond the flow test...happy to be corrected if i am wrong

Yes you could be correct supersport about me....but this was meant to be a show me well...why is additional appraisal required...i thought we were meant to have a successful flow test,then move on to planning for production...happy to be educated

Thanks marmaris.

i am long but worried.

the line where they talk about additional appraisal concerns me...i thought this flow test was meant to give us an answer one way or another.

i am dreading monday..hope they surprise me

Marmaris..you seem to be one of the most knowledgeable posters on here and you have posted many of your concerns about this test over the last many months...i just wondered if you feel the news on monday will be favourable or not and why please?

i am some what worried but i hope my concerns are misplaced

Thank you wind...i know thats what they said pre the drill but they havent confirmed subsequently and i wonder why.

if it is the correct content and but no commercial oil,i wonder if glenfarne could buy our acreage anyway and still make it work for the gas only

Does anyone know or has anyone asked if the co2 gas content is less than 2.5 pct?

thanks

Bricks..isnt the solution to do a reverse split???

I think many people have missed max,s comments at the bottom of the RNS.....I think we assumed he was stating what he stated in the main text...but in fact he adds a bit more colour...i really dont know why he didnt say what christmas gift quoted,in the main part of the RNS

My apologies thank you

Christmas gift...your message timed 20.44..unlesim mistaken,you have added words to that quote that were not in the rns,correct?

Zoekir.....i see this is your second post ever...what made you suddenly want to post on here ???

are you and expert in oil and exploration?

do you have a position,long or short in pantheon?

if you are concerned,why dont you send your concerns in an email to the company.

they are pretty good at replying,then you can share it with us all

Thanks...why is that significant??...although it does seem odd

1 buys?

Ezhik

are you short pantheon?

EZHIK..ref yout formation water ponderings..based on your theory,water happens to the injection water???disappeared as if by magic????and why would management have said they were 40 percent into the process if they knew it was mainly formation water that was coming out and not the injection water???