RE: Dohler22 Oct 2025 20:15
I think that there's something obvious about this that I'm missing, so I'm going to splurge my thoughts here and hopefully someone can fill in the blanks.
As I see it, Dohler want to control what happens, so they've bought a big chunk to (IIRC) take them from under 3% shareholders to about 18.99%, and for that they paid 305 per share, 15p above the Natara offer, which in itself is a huge statement of intent - they are clearly NOT playing games here.
They've then kept on buying at 255-265 to eventually take themselves up to 25% shareholders.
That gives them not just a lot of clout in the outcome, but probably they can actually determine the outcome - and it's cost them £40 million+ to do that.
Right now they are probably £5 million DOWN on that investment.
If they block the Natara bid, and the shareprice drops to sub £2, then they'll be £14 million+ out of pocket.
There are only 2 possibilities:
1) They do want the Natara bid to succeed;
2) They don't want the Natara bid to succeed;
If it's (2) above - well it might well have failed anyway, and spending £40+ million to make sure it does, knowing you'll be £14+ million out of pocket afterwards seems a crazy reckless way to go about it, unless there's some financial benefit to doing it, like, maybe, in the future, when the share price is, say, £1.50, they can come back and offer £1.90 per share; Then it's not -£14 million, it's +£lots of millions because of the overall savings.
If it's (1) above, then they'll pretty much break-even (or make or lose a small amount) on accepting the 290 offer, but why do this? Some people might imagine they might already have some kind of understanding with Natara, whereby we'll make this happen by controlling a huge chunk of the shares, and in return we get ???
I can't see what they get out of it in the short term by losing £14 million, unless in the long term that loss will disappear.
It's all very odd. My brain cannot compute it. Hopefully yours can.