RE: asset strippng2 Sep 2022 02:35
Haggis from what I have read in the year end financial's; (not being an accountant) if Rumuva is taken out of the equation, Scirocco is actually insolvent because the current deal they have with Gneiss means all income goes to them.
The corporate structure implies this will be the way Scirocco will continue to do business going forward.
I suspect that with each AD deal that is done, Gneiss's fees will be pegged to match.
I am expecting that with 3 AD plants generating an income of £1.8M+ a year, Gneiss will structure a deal where their rolling retainer fees & commission will be £2M+ a year which Scirocco will happily agree to meaning Scirocco will still be making a loss in 24months time. (Time will tell whether this is a ridiculous conclusion. The Gneiss arrangement could of course be ended after 15months with all new business going soley through EAG which in my opinion would be pivitol)
The only thing I read that may actually mean Scirocco retains any income, is from the fertiliser by-product. But being as those figures have not be given, we don't know how much that could generate. Presently I think the only value Scirocco has is in that potential fertiliser.
Yes Scirocco will bank £3M by December as initial payment from the sale of Ruvuma and maybe even another £3M in the following 3-6 months but how they deploy that capital will determine if the company can be turned around. I would love to believe this is a pivotal moment for Scirocco but I haven't seen anything which suggests the business will grow or that Scirocco is committed to generating a return for Shareholders. It appears to be running full speed ahead into a "saving the planet/not for profit" future where the only people who are sustained are the Board's of Scirocco, Gneiss & EAG, NOT shareholders.
In 10 months time Scirocco may have spent £6M buying 2 Windmills & a chain of recycled washing machines sunked in a river somewhere to exploit tidal energy from a river that will dry up in 2 years time lol.