Member Info for Shedulike

That's not true Shatner he has in the past directly referred to selling the asset, admittedly more guarded recently. Just a couple of weeks ago he mentioned talking to selective bodies and often references B2B events. It's the modus operandi of LR, MC and CB - we aren't going to see a giant neon 'For Sale' on the Toral ridge.

DJ you have taken to beating EUZ with a stick that is the general malaise of AIM. I agree that the record of companies on this market delivering for shareholders is awful but what is it specifically about EUZ that makes you think it isn't "Anywhere near working towards a sale"?

PVX233 "Those going to university in the 70s and 80s. Full grants, expenses and then buying property on low interest that made many millionaires for doing nothing. The socialism of those times far more extreme than now also". Margaret Thatcher was PM from 1979, people leaving uni in the late 70's and early 80's faced high interest rates and while I do remember full grants, putting in expenses claims in as a student??? Post-truth politics at it's worst.

No idea the choice is pretty grim RB, one thing I'm certain of is Boris Johnson is completely unfit for office. Labour made a big mistake not going with David Milliband all those years ago. Would probably have a realistic opposition now and a chance of stopping this Brexit madness. Anyway don't want to upset anyone or get into a row so back to POG. I'd probably be increasing my position as things look pretty positive, it's just that nagging worry about Russia politically and joking aside we do seem to get a catastrophic weather event at some point in the winter.

Nige that's kind of what I'm getting at about putting shareholders interests to the fore in the next few months. LR has mentioned that the presentation is about risk reduction, but for PI's risk reduction should also be about getting the asset to a marketable position without another damaging equity raise. I hope they're thinking the same way but if there was a choice between getting this away for a reasonable sum in the near term and raising more cash to go for the jackpot deep into 2020 I'm pretty certain which way PI's would vote. My fault for not going to the AGM but I'd like some reassurance that our teams natural curiosity as geologists plus professional ambitions couldn't work against shareholder interests. To be fair I've got no reason to suspect that could happen just busy finding new things to worry about!!

Ha ha Bricks interesting read. Definitely feeling the orphan period!

Nobody will be surprised that I agree Bricks. I just don't think all the 'unse*y' stuff is being appreciated by the market yet - infrastructure, established supportive mining region, water analysis, local engagement and so on, but interested parties most definitely will. I do think it's time for the management to take more care of shareholders though and they should have a clear plan for current funds to see us through to a conclusion.

It does seem to be moving from that range-bound 10-10.5 area at long last. Strange as gold hasn't met expectations so perhaps something in the background, don't think it can be the Amur bridge as although positive the benefits are so far down the line. Usually when things start looking up we get a biblical flood but there's so much to be upbeat about here. There I've given a cue for RB to enter stage left and pour scorn on the whole enterprise! Only joking RB what do you reckon has caused this mini surge? Perhaps Polygon will report they've thrown the towel in, I'll certainly be checking the FCA site on Monday.

Yep Oil I'm very positive now, such a shame that the 2018 mistakes led to such pitiful equity raises. It's obvious that's the single factor keeping the 'foot on the throat' of our SP. Hopefully the metallurgy will help alleviate that and concentrate minds on all the practical work progressing this project to mining, then any evidence of talks and BANG!

Def next week sometime though my crystal ball's still on the blink. On Adriatic again, their wider portfolio of minerals is a strength but they are scattered across a number of sites. We have nearly as much value of metal in just one potential mine - that must translate into enormous cost savings bureaucratically, logistically, on services and I'd assume on capex as well. Just for balance they have flippin great bundles of cash after a good raise while we have... well not so much. As long as the necessary work can be completed to get this away it won't matter but I've said that before I admit.

Steve, Adriatic Metals are HQ'd in Cheltenham (Stamford House, Regent St) could you ring their buzzer and ask them why EUZ's mcap is x25 less than theirs when we have a just slightly less value of resource gross across all metals?

Yeah bit of a lack of appreciation of the value of the mets to the industry. Can't defend the awful raises but will defend LR's record since the start of the spring and summer work programme. I have to get on the road so can't go through this piece by piece but I wholeheartedly disagree that we're a long way from sale. DJ is overlooking all the practical measures being brought together to prepare the package. All a bit unexciting for AIM at the moment but they'll soon look up. I actually think LR is a good communicator but the style is a little unusual, however I take it as a positive that he's probably the antithesis of a used car salesman. Right M5 beckons, thank heavens it's not the holiday season!!

Try not to bite guys it's the worst thing to allow a conversation that will go nowhere to start (I admit I have frequently but it's pointless). We're going to have a flood of slippery fish when the next good news comes in but we know who they are from last time. To be honest I the think the quick trade money will have less of an impact once the mets come in as there should be more big money for the rubber-stamped asset.

Cobra - really wish I'd gone but I would have had to have worked well into the early hours last night to meet a deadline this morning and catch a very expensive commuter train from Bristol. Given what I've got on this it feels a bit mad not to have been there, I really want some answers about the practice of sharing information with the industry without updating shareholders. I'm certain at some stage this has to be formalised, as long as it can be justified I'm not necessarily against it, just want clarification and reassurance.

Bad luck Steve you can console yourself with some of the figures paid back in the day, I think my worst was around 0.12p, I'm sure there's plenty of LLLTH's who can substantially top that. Frustrating day, has anyone heard anything from the AGM?

Yams - I think we need to think about the copper as a potential bonus but one which we may never fully explore. Given the drill location it looks like a very safe play to increase our Pb-Zn-Ag indicated. No feedback from the AGM yet?

As nobody has been speculating about the mets for at least 5 seconds I thought I would proffer my new theory (working title "Mets The U-Turn"). We were first told they had started on 25th Sep and learnt that 3 of the four elements were complete by 15th Nov. Assuming they all take a similar length of time which is unlikely that's 17.33 days per process. They had started the final element by 15th Nov so that takes us to just before lunchtime on 3rd December.

I can't tell the difference anyway Dave! Even some experts were embarrassed by a blind tasting between Champagne, Cava, Prosecco and they even slipped in dry cider - yes you've guessed it!

Pathetic - I think I'll go on the independent assay results from ALS Laboratories, the JORC from world-renowned AMS and soon to be published mets from Wardell Armstrong thanks very much.

Thanks for trying Verbs - anyone else from the board make it?