Member Info for sharezy

Your one sided, brainless diatribe can, quite frankly, do one.

Not from my entry…

And given years of daily spamming and trolling, given a total lack of moderation on this board, it whatever it wants.

I think I’ll continue, thank you very much

Are you going to blame the management for your bad investment decisions over there as well? 😂🤪

down 30% with a big holding.

ouch!

bragging about how you were buying ggp instead of shares here.

maybe go over there and tell them how **** a company it is.

such a loser 😂

Triggered, much 😂

Idc

And bought it’s “biggest investment” (£500?!) - GGP. 🫣🤭

Technically can go to 3400 and still be in a bull market.

Healthy correction.

And then the next move higher - will be for around the time of first production.

Beautiful hold.

Bonker0801

Have your day in the Sun.

Your commentary about anything that goes wrong here is cold blooded you need the heat exposure.

Of course, some people will be selling. For every seller there is a buyer….

And then in due course, this will reprice to reflect the reality of the value here.

But you, you will still be a soulless ghoul.

We have funding now.

Haven’t seen any decent points in days.

You realise it is inevitable now, anon?…

Not from people buying shares at 1.2p 🙃

Mad house this.

Bonkers0801 makes very little sense in several posts today.

Bizarre commentary on a company it has no skin in the game for.

Most longwinded repetition of the boring details of recent comms and some childish playground remarks about other posters he’s digging up comments from months ago.

So much effort.

So little point.

It is possible to be bad at both…. Ably demonstrated by bonkers0801

Maybe stay in the garden Pat, put an alert on for share price movements, and stop stressing about whether you can recap your losses from other poor investments.

We had a bunch of options on the table and took the least worst one, all factors considered (including, if you listen to the interview Harry gave, the fact that we are now on a strict construction timescale - so yes if negotiations took too long we would’ve triggered a back stop option)

Falling apart like a “ house of cards in the wind” - are you sure you’re not describing your investment strategy?….

I hope that he goes and reads up on the company and looks at the management we already have in place.

The board is not running the company day to day…

Of course in due course there will be a new board. This has never been in question and has been clarified and corroborated by the existing board.

It’s a case of framing.

Your constant negativity is appalling and unwarranted.

Even now you are framing it as the banks telling the company off.

It’s just a case of maths - I said all along you could increase the share registered by 100% and it still be highly profitable.

Nobody invested wants dilution.

You’re invested, you’ve been incredibly impatient for financial close.

Now you have it - perhaps you can turn your mind to more constructive things.

Https://youtu.be/f5rprZh1KDM?si=7Xo7vquWTQNcAKGx

Bonkers0801 sounds very angry now.

Not quite sure why. Maybe allergic to reasonable posts.

Maybe triggered by someone being happy with the prospect of making money here.

Thats why we’re here, wonder why it is here… hmmm 🤔

Bonkers0801 seems to think we care about it's posts.

We do not.

It is wrong again.

Today, bonkers0801 is trying to look to the past as a way of spreading fear about the clearly positive future.

It has taken the time to document several pre-revenue raises that have kept this show on the road. A huge achievement in itself.

Why, you have to ask yourself, would someone do this - to what end?

Is it to try to spend fear and doubt about a project that is now taking off?

What would lead someone to do this? Could it be that they themselves, through bad decisions and panic, have lost money? Or perhaps they think that they should try to derail something that’s clearly good, simply out of spite.

It seems to avoid the fact that these shares are cheap, and have the potential to get to 5p in due course, without gold going to $7,000 or any value from Saudi, or any expansion in existing resources.

My calculations show this easily at 3-4p but well in excess of 10p in a matter of 2-3 years whichever way you cut it.

I don’t see many other clear cut opportunities like this to park some funds in over the short to medium term.

Anyone trying to persuade you that the future is tarnished by the past - I would question their motives and bias.

What's slightly perturbing, is that anyone maligning management has next to no idea what was or is or might be on the table in front of them either in terms of of opportunity or risk.

There's a general meeting coming up, at which point questions can be put to management. So maybe come up with a coherant ask, and you can expect more clarity on whatever it is that confuses you.

Also, use critical thought.

Gold mine, generating significantly more cash than the current MC in a couple of years. Second jurisdiction adding value.

As "bonker0801" has pointed out repeatedly (ask why would someone do this) that the proven reserves are much smaller than the "potential" reserves.

This is playing on fears - urging caution - without considering the other side of the equation - that experienced geologists have inferred a doubling or tripling of current resources - in the fullness of time - anyone who dares to consider what that might mean for share price is shot down. But run the maths - the potential is huge, and these people - without any skin in the game - and having made a relatively small loss - are shooting their mouths to disrupt legitimate conversation.

Recent raises reduce the share price potential - every holder understands that - none of them like it - but also readjust calculations - you've worked out the likely outcomes based on known and predicted factors, right?

What happens next is growth to a multi-billion entity - over a number of years - which takes capital, fortuitous entry point, foresight and patience. Sorry if you don't have these.

tl;dr - bonkers0801 deserves to be filtered, but needs to be read and rebuffed - because that moniker - and others VERY like it is deliberately forcing discussion away from to balanced dialogue.