Member Info for sharesport

Just been reading an article in the Telegraph.

Labour-run Westminster council has unveiled plans which could mean residents with EVs may be charged for parking permits.

It goes on to say Vehicles with larger batteries are to pay more because they have a higher carbon footprint, take up more space and cause more wear and tear to the road.

Under the current rules owners of EV or plug in hybrids only have to pay for the first ten minutes to obtain the maximum stay in the bay which is commonly four hours. Cost for this could be under one pound.

The new proposals could scrap the rule and parking in the same zone could increase from one pound to eighteen pounds.

The council said the existing charging structure was unsustainable with the rapid growth in EVs.

The permit prices were reported as being in the range 40 to 80 pounds per year

Interesting indeed. The charges could catch on.

Which page of the bashers handbook did you get that one from Constructive. Good grief time to filter you I think.

As marker pointed out earlier today:

You are very, repetitive, Constructivenews.

You're saying exactly the same thing on more than one board.

A de-ramper, ignore.

It relates to early investment in well priced storage and distribution assets to support and complement the off grid power business. To be complemented by hydrogen generation capability through ammonia cracking and methanol reforming.....next stage to demonstrate commercial viability of hydrogen to displace diesel...

RNS - purchase of UK mobile hydrogen storage and distribution assets from Octopus Hydrogen

Great news - launch of Speedy Hydrogen Solutions and First Orders

Nobody said this was going to easy seems very relevant.

Some interesting discussion here.

Looking back if someone had told, me when planning for Protos was awarded, where we would be now I probably would have disagreed.

But we are where we are and are still alive and kicking. The management changes have been incredibly frustrating but in the mix also is the status of the hydrogen economy, the jump from Chester demo to Protos which may have been too much too soon. Where are we now - awaiting build of the unit at Bridgend which will be the shop window. Patents are in hand which I am assuming to be well written. The fact that there is a challenge shows the content to be of value I believe. The technology should be a valuable asset provided the right steps are taken moving forward. I sold some shares into the last rise and have built up a similar position. Nobody knows where this is really going but I remain hopeful. Glah

Time to filter thaiger I think. Spends alot of time posting looking for as many negatives as they can think of. Yawn. Filtered.

RNS Ammonia Cracker Milestone Achieved

Https://www.h2-view.com/story/ceres-and-alma-to-explore-opportunity-for-solid-oxide-technology-in-marine/2100637.article/

Just came across this which was also posted from a different link earlier today

https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/ceres-and-alma-announce-maritime-collaboration/

Speedy Hire have purchased the share capital of Green Power Hire Limited who are a battery storage units.

The Chief Exec commented at the end of the RNS about the proposed JV with AFC and added that the acquisition progresses the sustainable and technological evolution of the sectors they operate in and that they support the plan to become a net zero business.

Apologies if already posted but I don't think I have seen this. Link refers to grant for AFC of nearly £5M and how they have planned deployments at two quarry sites.

https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/unlocking-the-hydrogen-economy-uk-pours-25-7-million-into-hydrogen-based-red-diesel-alternatives/

RNS - distribution in Saudi and other MENA Markets

Interesting discussion on here again Chilting and Aquae. The R&D spend has increased in the SOEC business including for the contract with Shell which would seem to be planning for the future.

Some tend to look at cash forecast and burn more than me as I these stocks are different to companies which are fully established. I tend to base my views on the longer term. Agreed that cash is important though but am not concerned at all as things stand with the level and use of existing monies.

I am hoping it will be well worth the wait.

I am with Chilting on this. Circa £180M some of which is cash and some is invested so can't see any reason whatsoever for any cash injection. This is similar to any household who requires cash and has some money invested and would need to plan when to access it. The management have done a good job getting us to this point and I expect this to continue. I am a long term holder, sold a few into the big rise and have been adding more since. Good luck all whatever your strategy is. I personally just hold this and don't try and anticipate movement for trading purposes.

Agreed Bilb.

I am aware and use FMEA also and it does make you wonder what on earth they were doing before.

Yes GC got us to this point but should have requested Support for Production etc. much earlier.

Dennis is changing lots of things for the better.

The claim was ITM had lost Shell.

The claim was unknown to all but the poster as far as I am aware.

Let's see what today brings and how many more negatives the traders and shorters go out of their way to post.

Didn't see any source for the ITM Shell claim posted yesterday so unless it is forthcoming it remains to be proven as factual. It was requested a couple of times but wasn't provided.