RE: Summary of 88E/PANR comparative valuation7 Feb 2024 09:54
It happened over 12 months so 16 months is 'factually incorrect'. I said it happened over days, even it if happened over 365 days, my statement was more 'factually correct' than yours.
Sorry to board have paid themselves salaries to do their job. I wouldn't say handsomely, but that depends on individual expectations of what a good salary is.
The funds are raised for investment activity, but the spin you are putting on it is the funds are raised solely to pay themselves. Factually incorrect again.
Dave Wall held (and maybe still holds?) many shares here. Yes, it would be good for Ashley to accumulate some shares, but not a deal breaker for me, maybe it is for others.
If you can't see Scot's motives, then don't, but I can, so will go against him.
Would you spend your time on another share forum that you're not invested in?