Member Info for share4

Agreed trout. reading between the lines this has a whiff of desperation about it.

Determined to undo the hard work put into other investors with this ridiculous 1x revenue narrative.

See that's understandable that you're pinning your hopes to this company on it gaining SaMD approval and developing a scalable SAAS based product.

The existing revenue doesn't seem relevant in that context.

Great, so why are people then talking about 1x revenue or whatever. Why don't you ask better from your fellow investors and tell them to talk about how the dosing software is going to disrupt the market and put some actual numbers behind it instead of coming up with simplistic and non-applicable formulas for trying to claim the company is undervalued.

Nobody can understand what this company is doing other than losing money and continually taking more off investors. Is it a consultancy? Is it a product business? What is it really? Because it can't seem to decide and seems to have ended up in a situation where it's been continually subsiding customers for over 20 years and still doesn't have an offering that investors can point to and understand how the maths stacks up.

The company brought itself down, we have nothing to do with it.

No I'm saying the obsession with revenue is pathetic.

People who are waiting for an oil company to strike oil don't value the company according to it's revenue, they value it on future profitability, so you've just proved my point.

This obsession with revenue is pathetic

If I set up an online b2c business tomorrow, buy 200k worth of goods, and them sell them online for 100k I'll have made 100k of revenue. I'm sure people will be happy to purchase half price good from me.

Just because my business has 100k of revenue doesn't mean it's worth 3 million because amazon is priced that way

Well off you go then, 3% is only 24k, lets see you back up your daily posts for several years with some cold hard cash.

Nothing's wrong with them helping in this area.

But if they can't make it profitable then they need to delist and get their funding from grants instead of investors.

Well done optic being honest with yourself is good.

Says it all that someone goes to the dentist to escape this board

I think Burt made a good decision to cut his losses.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/PYC/senior-management-update-eaf1fgzgh6v93vj.html

RNS Number : 2013L

Physiomics PLC

04 September 2023

4 September 2023

Physiomics plc (AIM: PYC), the oncology consultancy using mathematical models to support the development of cancer treatment regimens and personalised medicine solutions, is pleased to announce the hiring of a new member of its senior management team. Effective today, Dr Peter Sargent will be joining the Company as Chief Operating Officer ("COO").

Prior to joining us, Dr Sargent held a senior management role at global consultancy business Syneos Health Inc (NASDAQ: SYNH

--

Apparently he's been with PYC for 4 years and I should do my own research

Https://www.physiomics.co.uk/news-update-from-physiomics-february-2024/

Peter, who joined Physiomics in September 2023 as Chief Operating Officer

--

just in case you need to read something twice to understand what it says

It literally says he joined in September 2023, suggest you take it up with the business

Suspect the reason for the rise today is because a few pump and dumpers have come over from EME

Https://www.physiomics.co.uk/news-update-from-physiomics-february-2024/

Peter, who joined Physiomics in September 2023 as Chief Operating Officer, has now been appointed to Chief Executive Officer to take the lead in growing the business and driving the overall strategy.

4 years?

And if you think this is common then tell me which companies have had their CEO leave like this and then do well afterwards.

How's the share price done since the previous CEO stood down just over a couple of years ago?

It's not just 'somebody' it's the CEO and he's been here for just over 2 years.

If this is such a great opportunity why did he decide not to continue?

Which begs the question if this is such a great opportunity why did the CEO decide not to continue?