MSmith..18 Feb 2015 18:40
1) KEA have no revenue stream now as the PUKA site is shut in.
2) KEA is having a strategic review due to the following, taken from the RNS..
Background
On 14 January the Company announced that, as a result of the current oil price and a mechanical problem, it had shut in production at its Puka site. It also announced that it continues in discussions with potential farm-in partners for its Mercury, Mauku and Shannon prospects.
At the time of the publication of the Company's final results the Directors stated the Company was in discussions to secure additional funding to cover an expected funding shortfall in 2015. To date the Company has not entered into any funding agreements but discussions continue.
As a consequence of a combination of these factors the Board has decided to commence a strategic review. In the meantime the Company has taken a number of cost cutting measures to preserve its working capital which remains tight.
3) All KEA assets are available for farmout..up to now there are no takers & MEO look to have abandoned any hope of completing phase 2 of the original PUKA deal & are in the process of a merger with MSMN.
4) IRGS has only just decided to look at expenses again quote from RNS ' In the meantime the Company has taken a number of cost cutting measures to preserve its working capital which remains tight'
Salaries circa £100k per month, offices in Westminster circa £25k per month, round the world travel circa £20k per month & general working expenses & debt repayments on bank facility circa £55k per month.
5) Who would be interested? Given IRGS's massive ego & terrible track record with KEA, especially after finding oil when prices were rising upwards of $110 a barrel.
6) Bad workmanship & general sloppy management coupled with all of the above would make it difficult for anyone to be interested
7) Cash is almost out..more dilution on the way, which means a visit to Darwin again for the usual rinse & repeat which will ultimately prove fatal this time but if they can squeeze 6 more months out of this then they will go ahead.
8) There is an outstanding dispute..
21. Contingent liabilities
The Group is defending claims brought against Kea Petroleum Holdings Limited and two operating subsidiaries by NRG Drilling Limited. Kea has taken legal advice and accordingly considers that it has strong defences to the claims and will vigorously defend them. An unfavourable outcome to the litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position.
This will probably be resurrected if a sale is forthcoming which will involve brown envelopes & nothing left for shareholders in the end as this will be dragged out before any value is left for shareholders.
9) Administration will probably ensue as IRGS's slovenly attitude & lack of initiative to the whole business will leave him an easy exit, after years of good wages & bonuses on the strength o