Member Info for Setanta1

I don't think the BOD will make any acquisition before,( and not for a long time after), the completion of FEED. The fall in the sp was most likely related to .24 placees and others who bought on the open market just after the placing selling some of their holdings to take advantage of the 100% plus gains they have made.

Look as if it may be an investment made for a major gas supplier who does not wish to have its identity revealed just now. I would guess we are about to see more buys from the same source. Good news.

Investors are beginning to realise what an opportunity they missed in the last few days. Now the management is free of distractions and united I can only see upward pressure on the sp from now on. I'm very glad I added my cheap 3million the other day. Just imagine how it will go when we get the pending news!

That will be AP cleared and the buyers can get back in again.

I think you may have put it rather more delicately than I did!

AP could be selling his cache. Was that a joke. Not really.

I can sell 3million@.608 p. But to buy just Im is .6245p.

Like spud I very much doubt that AP's exit was a resignation. That matter settlled we can look forward to reporting on the FEED milestones and to news on finance and first tenants for the facility fairly soon.
CC's never produce any earth shattering news. This one was merely aimed at giving shareholders a closer view of the newly constituted BOD in action.As for the warrants. I don't believe there were more than 10 million exercised in the past week. In a way I wish the holders would get on with that exercise.
And Mega I don't believe we'll hear anything about new projects until after the construction of the facility has begun, and even then it will be related to further uses for the facility.

You'll be happy to hear that the investor you've mentioned is prospering with the share in which he placed the money he decided to take out of INFA. Even today it gained several percent.His reason for supporting AP so strongly was because they were both invested in another share simultaneously. He believed very firmly that AP and PW would make a success of INFA and he was bitterly disappointed by the lack of communication and the lack of fulfilment of the promises AP made as danawinner. See how INFA goes tomorrow. Go Well.

I don't think anyone has shown undue disrespect for Adrian. Everyone would agree that it took hard work and courage to do what he did. But that was his choice. I agree that the ousted BOD didn't look as if it was on the right track but the fulsome promises danawinner made on behalf of the requisitioners were never remotely realised. Let's not be too pi. Adrian was elected to do a job for which he was paid, and which he wanted to do.He fulfilled practically none of the promises he made to those who voted him in.You say he suffered at the hands of the market. What about all the INFA investors who lost their shirts as the SP collapsed under his watch?

Very sudden severance by any standards. Anyone who posts here knows that I never liked the April .24p placing. I thought it was uncecessary to fund FEED in that way and I also agree with 1750mk1's comments in the previous post relating to the matter.
But danawinner was the one who enthused me to follow himself and PW into INFA and so I wish his part in what will be a success story had had a better ending.
Now it's for the BOD under John Wood to take us forward as I know he can and will.

The buy is 1m @ .8975 and 250k @ .8825p.But I guess you all know that. Good luck with your decisions here.

EQT apparently does not have the resources to fund a decent construction programme. It's other problem is that it's major shareholder Eiboss is also short of funds and it's sp today has fallen to 27.5 Euros (down 20% in the last two days), against a 2018 high of 80Euros. Finance is the problem. When,(or if), that is sorted EQT should soar. The project looks to be sound and even necessary. Meanwhile the market is giving it's judgement.

I thought that L&G had probably dictated the significant BOD changes. Now we know it wasn't them, so who was it? It clearly wasn't the CEO at the time of the changes. So I assume that one of the important investors or possible users wanted the change to John Woods. He has certainly given a very positive impression since his arrival, not least by investing his own money in the project. I see good times ahead. And Avyerdowt you may be right but I sometimes think that for an investment as low in their scale as INFA was to L&G there is nobody scrutinising it personally. It's just the machines deciding what gets sold. But you could be right. Let's dsee whether they buy in again!

The monolith L&G appears to have sold out at around .43p which doesn't look very smart as an investment decision even at todays price, never mind the circa.8p of a month ago. It's the machines I tell you.They're in charge, the fools!

Dawski, L&G sold at, or around, 1 June and our nomad didn't follow the procedure for reporting it correctly. I hold not a great deal less than L&G held and I don't think it would be considered a disaster if I sold. Institutional investors sell automatically on a particular day when the SP hits a preordained price.
Infrastrata is sound and I expect to see it troubling .7p quite soon. There are still a few placees and .26p ers taking "a few off the table" as they like to term it. But I think we are at a great price for entrants just now and all of mine are staying on"the table".
INFA has a new well invested BOD and is negotiating with financiers and major renters. That's what counts.

I suppose we can assume that the non reported TR-1 in June was L&G selling. Long time ago and a lot of water under the bridge since then. What we now need is NEWS!

Well of course you're right . So that suggests that L& G haven't sold any of their holding but that they have been driven just under the 3% threshold by the April dilution and that wasn't reported until today. That would be an excellent interpretation and would suggest that today's action was all about nothing--apart from ineptitude on the part of somebody in INFA's nomad who, having failed to report correctly in June reported today without presenting any detail. Is that a feasible interpretation Builder? If it is I'm even more pleased with my buying today.

In the week leading up to, and including. 1 june there were only 39 million shares traded in INFA. That number includes buys as well as sells. L&G held about 60 million shares so they couldn't possibly have sold all of them that week. Yet L&G does not appear as a current shareholder on the Infrastrata website updated today.

But I'm happy because I hold 3million more tha I held yesterday and I'll be very surprised if those 3million are not in profit very soon. So with my large holding I can play trader, short term holder and long term holder as the conditions suit me.

Well done re the email I was thinking about doing that myself.

And spud, I've seen the Nex deals. The 1million shares is mine. Thanks anyway.