RE: Special General Meeting14 May 2024 10:44
Agreed G. This is an investment decision. They make a call and get it wrong, then they should take the consequences. We make an investment decision and get it wrong, we take the consequences.
Can't see that the EGM argument is going anywhere, as its widely agreed to be a grey area in the law (thats why Aimshame is right to be campaigning to get it changed) - so because its grey those who wanted the EGM feel they were wrongly and illegally deprived of one, and those that thought in view of the AGM vote it was going to fail, will think the company acted sensibly and appropriately if they were not legally required to call a vote of confidence in themselves. No amount of arguing over the legal niceties is going to resolve a grey area or I suspect change anyone's opinion at this stage. The fact that it keeps coming up partly shows how angry people were at the time, but is mainly happening because the company is providing absolutely no evidence of progress at this stage about which we could talk more usefully. I sincerely hope that they are making good progress and all will be revealed soon - but we have gone for 5 months now without meaningful progress updates which is partly why the SP is down and we are attracting derampers.