Member Info for sergicanos

Yes, but remember he can't say anything that's likely to cause offence to the FDA.

"of" 5th October, not "on" 5th October. Relax everyone. Patience. Nothing has changed.

So have we cracked it then? We've cycled hard up to the top of the hill. We're just over the brow... do we free wheel away into the valley ahead or will there be roadworks? I reckon 3.62 at the end of a week is pretty symbolic, personally.

Looking at volume on H & L (don't have level 2) and the day seems to be largely blue. And yet -5%! WTF?

Should have!

Doh! I've gawn and done it again. So sorry, Ricky. I just cannot help myself.

Oui, mais ce sera en français, non? Donc il faudra que ce soit correct!

Thanks for that Yorkshireman1. (I'm Yorkshireman2, by the way - from Dewsbury).

LOLOLOL! I really must proofread my work. How long before someone spots the deliberate mistake in the last sentence? ;-)

Yes. Legal requirement to post RNS straight away, surely?

I'm going nowhere 'king King! ;-)

And wtf's happened to the sp in the last 30 mins? :-(

Listen, I'm not gonna argue too much lest you claim that the lady doth protest too much, but I can assure you that you couldn't be further from the truth. I am a beginning investor with a very small holding in this company and a couple of others. I want nothing but the best for my shares despite having already given an impression to the contrary, apparently.

Oh, and I'm a pedantic old git, too, who happens to believe that spelling and grammar, although not that important per se, can nonetheless detract from the impact of an otherwise persuasive and professional-sounding opinion.

Not I, Sir. I am a Premier League footballer.

Being proofread as we type. LOL

Monday is here again. Exciting times! This is going to be a positive week. A week for improvements. Improvement in the share price - I feel it in my bones ;-) And improvement in poster standards, I hope. We are going to get our spelling and grammar correct. We are going to proof read our sentences and spellcheck our words. Aren't we?!!

And here's just a little bit of help from me with two common errors I have spotted so far, just to get us all started:

1. "Islamist"
2. "corroborate"

Sorry for the pedantry. It comes with being an ex-languages teacher. I just cannot help myself. LOL

But seriously folks, have a good week y'all!

Actually... I see where you might be coming from. Negative sounding thread title? Yes, probably right. Sorry, was just trying to be clever by fitting "BRIDGE" into a known phrase. Should have thought of negative connotations. Apologies, I'm a newbie.

Taken from an interview on Vox yesterday (cannot work out how to post links).

Whoah! Steady there, Neddy! LOL You get me wrong! I actually think we tick a lot of those boxes. Difficult for any one company to tick them all, obs.

https://www.**********.co.uk/articles/simon-popple-talks-through-his-b-r-i-d-g-e-system-on-how-to-find-good-resource-companies--646853c

Resource specialist Simon Popple uses an acronym to guide him through his research of mineral stocks...

Balance sheet: avoid debt in pre-revenue companies. How much cash?
Resources: prefers politically safe jurisdictions (Oz, Canada, USA etc.). (but quality of mining neighbours also counts)
Infrastructure: cost/availability of transport/water/electricity/ processing etc.
Diversification: prefers a company with more than one asset
Grade: quality/processability/market price etc.
Exploration: what stage is company at? Prefers fields with potential + early in exploration cycle

Fair methodology? How are our ducks aligned at KOD?