Member Info for sellonnews

It is so good to finally read a discussion about the ubiquity and value of the Patents, the strength of which should not be undervalued!

Both OFEX and AIM for two decades, even longer in the Main Market.

Still smiling: Bermuda Companies, Section 97 (1) of the Companies Act

LOL you are rather humorous. Aren't "rocks" diamonds?

Your sagacity knows no bounds. However, the Companies to which you refer had nothing but growing losses and were obviously not viewed as a viable purchase. What differentiates CAP is, as explained, an order book, a multitude of patents (one of which has significant claims, difficult not to infringe given current technology - you are obviously aware that for infringement only one of the multiple claims has to be used to prove infringement, not the whole patent?), and EPA/CARB Certification. You will also be fully aware that for the loss offset to be allowed the acquiring Company has to be in the same sector as the business acquired - yet another reason why so many are "left to rot". It gladdens my heart to be able to discuss this with a "professional" who is fully conversant with all aspects and implications. It is sincerely hoped that everyone reads your post and questions its veracity. Every investment is a risk, some more so than others. In the event that the Company is not sold in the "best interest of shareholders" a formal complaint will be lodged with the FCA.

Using £60m for the current accumulated loss figure (makes the maths easier too lol), gives a saving of £12m on Corporation Tax. Include the facts that the net loss will allow profits on the bottom line of the acquiring Company equal to the offset (dividend payments/share buyback?), CAP's current contracts, and the Patents, would suggest a minimum share price of 6p, it is humbly suggested. The above is not an investment recommendation either way, but is intended as a topic for the sole purpose of discussion.

Don't know where the second "u" went lol

That is a nice offset against profits for any acquiring Company which, along with the Patents, doesn't appear to be reflected in the current share price.

Delightful RNS yesterday too: http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/12425987.html Now why issue 15000 shares as "an award in recognition of long service to the Company"? Initially founded in the USA in 1991, over $90m has been invested in developing the technology with the result that 62 patents are currently held or pending

It is humbly suggested that the patents alone are worth a multiple of the current Market Cap. Hopefully the BoD will hold out for an offer which reflects their true value! Here are some: http://patents.justia.com/assignee/clean-air-power-inc

It's a year old.

http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-detail/12420732.html

But, it would be good to have an update about JCB.

Should be talking to at least one of these manufacturers, if not already.

A simple Rights Issue @ 1p per share should resolve financing for 12 to 18 months thereby enabling OEM/Tier 1 contracts to be negotiated/completed within that timeframe. Issued on a one-for-one basis, with over-subscription privilege, plus warrants, possibly, to purchase an equal number of shares subscribed at a premium, eg 5p on or before the third anniversary. An opportunity for institutional investors to participate (Ervington/Shvidler?) at a reduced cost base, perhaps?

RADIATION DETECTOR DEVICE AND METHOD Application number: 20150142383 Abstract: A radiation detector device is described comprising a detection module, a processing module, and a display module, wherein the detection module includes a detector adapted to detect incident radiation in spectroscopically resolved manner in plural separate energy bands; the processing module is adapted to process the spectroscopically resolved data numerically and thereby to produce at least a first data item indicative of a measure of radiation incident at the detector and a second data item indicative of a statistical certainty applicable to the first data item; the display module is adapted to produce a display representative of both the first data item and the second data item. A radiation detection method, a kit of parts for implementing the same for example in combination with a suitable programmable device, and associated concepts, are also described. Type: Application Filed: May 21, 2013 Issued: May 21, 2015 Assignee: Kromek Limited Inventors: Ian Radley, Craig Hamilton Duff, Laura Joanne Harkness http://patents.justia.com/assignee/kromek-limited

Sales +11.4% to £1,111.5 million on an actual currency basis (2014: £997.8 million),

For me, the metallurgical side has great potential and I look forward to updates on all aspects of the progress being made.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-32917141