Member Info for sellonnews

How sweet of Picardy to focus on the gold mining holdings, leaving others, myself included, transfixed on the greater potential of TALY.

Aren't those headlights pretty?
.
.

Companies do in fact have up to six months to file, but it can be done much earlier eg Vodafone year end March 31 2018, annual report filed June 1 2018 (Just two months after year end).

As an unlisted company, TALY might go for an IPO based on the Q3 results, and include "subsequent events", but how difficult would it be for the annual report to be concluded in weeks when a £37 billion company can do it in two months?
.
.
(it takes under four weeks for VOD to announce Q results)
.
.

Annual Report to June 30 2019 (First two quarters of 2019)*
.
.

Moving forwards, albeit slowly. Does it make sense to wait for the Q2 numbers (April. May, June) before an IPO in July/August?
.
.

Thanks, pineapple288 - bring on the "pre-Brexit" marketing.
.
.

Isn't the option of buying up to and including April 5 and doing a Bed and ISA on April 6 also available?
.
.

stix40

Will the current beta testers be using the Mastercards in testing prior to them being universally available to all who sign-up via the apps?
.
.

October 3 2018*
.
.

"The Company has today granted warrants to the Lenders over 33,350,318 Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of 1.57 pence per Ordinary Share exercisable within three years from the date of grant"

October 3 2019
.
.
DYOR
.
GL
.

NBucky1

Expecting contract(s) news to follow shortly now that EQT have that extra £1,459,546 cash in hand.
.
.

Altair/Eco sold their shares, used proceeds to buy warrants, and as a result EQT received £1,459,546.

Be intertesting to see who purchased the sold shares.
.
.

March 7
.
.

Stoney40, thank you for this, obviously I overlooked it whilst focussing on the USPTO Appeal Hearing, also March 4.
.
.
GL
.

At some point this week, I'm expecting a Notice of Interim Results.
.
.

djwall1s

My observation was to correct the assumption by mrmineral that the BoD were using shareholders funds to pay their big salaries, where in fact for over 15 months it has been, in a large part, the BoD subscribing for shares and exercising warrants which has generated funding for LION.

I agree mostly with your analysis, and even directed Lazygun on February 23 to take up any issues regarding ISA holdings with the Nomad.

The delisting was obviously not planned however the decision to further delay has been in order to expand the Tally offering before doing so, and a perfect strategy imo

A recent update was very informative regarding progress, and coupled with updates on here about Tally account opening/experiences is very reasonable shareholder communication. Expecting news every day/week/month is a false expectation and irrational. Lion will update when appropriate and not pander to requests to the contrary, quite correctly. Hand-holding is a parental duty!
.
.

If all else fails, there's always an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

"The Federal Circuit has also overturned PTAB obviousness rulings that lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of motivation to combine. For example, in IPR Licensing, Inc. v. ZTE Corp., the Federal Circuit reversed an obviousness finding where the record did not provide a reason or show why the references cited or the knowledge of one of skill in the art at the time of the invention would motivate a skilled artisan to alter the standards with a reasonable expectation of success (685 Fed. Appx. 933, (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2017) (non-precedential)).Likewise, the Federal Circuit has reversed obviousness determinations where the PTAB failed to adequately explain its rationale to support an obviousness combination (see, for example, PersonalWeb Techs., LLC v. Apple, Inc., 848 F.3d 987, 993-94 (Fed. Cir. 2017))."
.
.
DYOR
.

The argument appears rather convincing imo

https://register.epo.org/documentView?number=US.201313781902.A&documentId=1-27-US++137819020PP1+

https://register.epo.org/documentView?number=US.201313781902.A&documentId=1-9-US++137819020RP1+

https://register.epo.org/ipfwretrieve?apn=US.201313781902.A&lng=en

Happy reading.
.
.

"paying BODs big money with holders funds"

It is humbly suggested that you look at the value of warrants exercised since suspension, including the most recent update in which £288,000 was raised. Is it being suggested that the BoD are putting their own funds into Tally to pay their own "big money" salaries?

"Included in the total Warrant Shares figure set out above, Lionsgold’s CEO Cameron Parry, exercised Warrant Shares to subscribe for 2,500,000 new Ordinary Shares in the name of Yarramen Corp Limited which is owned by his family trust; 20,000,000 Warrant Shares were exercised by Lionsgold’s Non-Executive Director, Mr Mike Joseph; and 1,000,000 Warrant Shares were exercised by Lionsgold’s Chief Platform Officer, Mr Ralph Hazel"

https://www.share-talk.com/lionsgold-limited-lonlion-update-proposed-name-change-and-voting-rights/
.
.
DYOR
.

Does one hold long-term for 100p, or sell as soon as it hits 5p?

If Tally can grow as planned, there will be exponential global uptake imo. How many will just hold the gold without using the debit facility? The percentage cut of initial purchase then insurance/storage fees would give a constant revenue stream to Tally - do the math, 100,000 accounts each with £20,000 deposited, 500,000 accounts...1,000,000, and so forth. For those using the debit facility, I see as the "bread and butter" revenue stream.

How many Companies will start using Tally as a hedge against currency variations?

Customers would demand transparency, and for this reason alone I suggest that a re-listing is a foregone conclusion.

Comments and observations more than welcome.
.
.
GL
.

Anyone holding the shares in a SIPP will have absolutely no tax of any form to pay.
.
.