Member Info for SelfishMcNimby

What part of my post 'told you' not to speak to him?
I only have personal vendettas with people who are conning genuine shareholders. If you think that's a problem, maybe you're more gullible than you think.
A healthy difference of opinion with someone who wishes to destroy our investments? Doesn't sound a healthy situation to me.
Blasphemy?
You need to wake up to who your allies are Tacuma. I take it you've been kicked around without realizing it all your 73 years. The trouble is you misinterpret everything.

Tacuma. Please don't respond to oilisthefuture as if he was a shareholder. He is obviously not. He's a tree hugger aggressively pretending to be a shareholder, whilst trying to stir the shlt. What a nice person.

https://energyindustryreview.com/renewables/geaa-new-association-to-promote-geothermal-energy-role-in-the-energy-transition/

Strange that soulac's link to the Mark Abbott interview, and my post thanking him for posting it, have been removed. Was there something someone would object to in the interview, or in my post? Just curious.

Good post bobby, but according to some negative posters on here, those assets don't count. Well, they wouldn't for a tree hugger, would they oilisthefuture?

It would be nice if Edge was signed off soon by the Irish government. It's been nearly a year fgs.

I would have thought that if people post a load of poorly written factually incorrect rubbish on here, it is perfectly acceptable for it to be pointed out by shareholders. Or are some posters (the ones who criticiZe the company), untouchable?

So are you saying this relates to you IAmAnAnus?

'The first is well thought out negative posts that show why a company isn’t doing well, or isn’t going to do well, usually backed up by data.'

If so, where's the data?

From my earlier post. Which category is IAmAnAnalyst in?

2. Nonsense negativity on social media.

There are two different types of negative posts. The first is well thought out negative posts that show why a company isn’t doing well, or isn’t going to do well, usually backed up by data. These are fine. Usually posted by real people. Some companies are bad, and they rightfully deserve to tank.
But the second type of negative post is one like: “This stock is garbage!”
This is nonsense.
These are posted by paid manipulators or inexperienced investors frustrated by the direction of the stock price.

Sorry, not sure how that happened.

Good post Tacuma.

Plenty visit here.

https://www.griproom.com/fun/10-signs-your-stock-is-being-manipulated

Good post Tacuma.

So you've decided to moan about Reabold instead of Europa for a change, oilisthefuture. I said you were a tree hugger. Don't tell me, you've had shares here for years lol.

Is there any evidence to that effect, persimmon, or are you talking your normal bolox?

The data gathering was completed by 20th April. In fact, data was already in Romania being processed, and was expected to take 2 weeks in total.

It was 'draft' because they were waiting for the findings of the Cased Hole Logging Programme and Vertical Seismic Profiling, which was completed last month. The processing and interpretation of the data was expected to take two weeks and would inform completion, well clean-up and EWT operations for WNB-1Z well. This would be provided to the EA for completion, but as the draft had been approved, it should be a straightforward box ticking exercise. That's why they said the EWT should start this month.

A shame you don't provide the full picture persimmon, instead of your normal nudge nudge wink wink distortion.

Hostile takeover? They'd want a significant shareholding themselves to get the ball rolling (or at least the right noises from significant shareholders already in place). Let's face it, with most of the shares in the hands of institutional investors, who I'm sure would be kept well informed as to the facts, any low ball offer would be pointless as it would be given short shrift.

Perhaps you should spend a bit more time looking at the Victory gas discovery Genghis, and it's implications for Corallian, and therefore for Reabold. Only if you are genuinely interested, of course. If you just want to carry on knocking the company for whatever reason, go ahead. But expect an argument if you do.

I will point one thing out though. You seem to suggest that if West Newton failed (which personally I think is laughable), that there would be such a devastating loss of money that the other assets couldn't cover them. This is simply a distortion of the situation. In effect the cash has been raised and allocated for all of the projects, including West Newton. And there is no debt. The market cap currently constitutes an amount for the value of West Newton. Since the market cap is only £60m, it can't be much. The other assets, however much the likes of persimmon rubbishes them, have considerable value, and the cash balance is very healthy.

So considering the other assets, the cash balance and the fact that the presence of shlt loads of oil and gas have been proven to be present at West Newton, and gas AND oil have been proven to flow, it is risible to suggest that West Newton could break the company.

So are you saying it was 'Stephen' who said West Newton was make or break for Reabold, Genghis? If you're going to make dumb statements, back them up. FWIW I have spoken to several of the key personnel at West Newton, regularly, (but I won't name them because that's pretty poor), and one thing they are NOT saying, is it is make or break for the company.

That's why they've stuck 100's of thousands of pounds in. Bleeding obvious.