Member Info for sebo10

Do what you think is best. Vague statements are disappointing and everyone hopes for some proper meat on the bone. This work is leading edge and very hard. Mission statements will change as they understand more about what's possible. That's how science works, it evolves beyond your best guessing and predictions sometimes. Lets see some mining results that should give a clear signal for the future value here.

I think that you have no more insight than anyone else. You think that this is a pump and dump now? I've been on the investment scene for a decade, I spottted Boohoo back in 2012 and invested at that time. Aim is a risky business full of crooks and morons out to fleece people. I can spot bull****, I've had plenty of practice. Qbt doesn't worry me at this time.

The sharp drop back will only occur if we become massively overvalued. The market will always punish those who pile in after a result - that's what happened with Argo. Qbt offers world-beating tech that will stop the competition its tracks. I expect this company to reach billions.

Any profit is good. Many investors lose money most of the time. I just feel that we're a world beater if the tech proves exceptional. That's got to be a multi-billion £ company in the making.

I'm waiting for more than a quid. Surely this tech could be revolutionary for bitcoin. It will help the currency survive in the quantum age.

2-3 working days. It depends on the broker, but it shouldn't take long. Sometimes share sales take a while to work through. Keep checking your statements.

I hope we are all rewarded for once. My last investments were all duds - Amigo, He1 and Pat. Admittedly, these were risky bets.

Do you think that this is a good investment? We all expect groundbreaking news. There are few numbers to go on though. There must be a reason for vague rns statements, it's probably nothing to worry about.

I often wonder how far this can go. Will it break 3 billion, maybe 5? 10B? The vast majority of UK firms are valued under 2B. Will we be bought out before we get anywhere impressive?

Thanks for the link. A bit of a jumbled article... I'm convinced that the author doesn't know anything. The Rns is rather confusing in parts. Especially, around what Method A and B do differently. B requires an Asic and the Method A does not? Would it take the Asic to take us beyond the the very best conventional mining Asics?

I was a phd student, I didn't hold the departmental elders up as superior. Many of them were mediocre - short men on intellectual stilts. A good mind will find the right answers whether young or old.

When do we expect an interview wirh FG? Just need some clarity. I think that most people are confident that this will come right.

I'm waiting on the interview that should follow this latest RNS. My sense is that AI may outperform the conventional 5nm Asic route. Semiconductor design is a very expensive business. I hope for revolutionary results.

The asic chip is one of three routes to faster mining. The other two are AI based (knowledge based) and quantum computing. The Al based techniques are so good that they could be implemented on GPUs and still beat the competition. My guess is that they will use the fastest / most energy efficient tech available. Proper quantum computing hardware capable of cracking BTC might be years away. AI and optimized asic will be first over the line?

Vague rns, but what does this mean?
'The second knowledge-based mining approach (Method ‘B’) will need the availability of a proprietary ASIC chip which, if successful, probabilistic mining could be improved by several factors compared to today’s deterministic BTC mining using commercial ASIC chips.'
I assume it refers to the speed increase advantage of using Asics vs FPGA/GPUs. That's what I read. The method A is fast enough to make FPGAs competitive. These are bold statements without numbers. I understand concern, hope our faith is rewarded. I would love to see 100x improvement over current tech.

The radio silence is admirable. No leaks or squeaks. Just deathly silence when you fly Qbt. I hope they have some trial mining on the go.

He1 was a big loss for me too. The difference there was a real attempt to mislead investors through social media in a cynical attempt to trap people when the share price bombed after the first failure imo. There is no slight of hand here, just no news. I hope it will be good news for all our sakes. Last roll of the dice for me.

I hope for more than 3p when news lands. It was more than that in Nov. Good news should send this over 10 p. Bad news and the share will tank.

I don't mind waiting, but the share price is bargin basement and below fair value for various reasons. Many are underwater as we invested late last year after the spike. We need news soon or the market will lose interest. I've seen it happen in other shares. The 2nd patent needs to be submitted soon or investors will assume that something is wrong and down we go.

The intel chip might not be as impressive as claimed. Their marketing refers to 1000x better than a GPU, not 5 nm Asic. Might only be a 10% improvement.... Who knows?