Member Info for Scarpa50

Me too. Good post.

That’s a perfectly valid assessment ReoninV. Personally I think if something can be improved upon then it should, especially if the company is listed. This is a fairly straightforward fix and at the moment we have little to no interest in the ‘L’ series. We’ll never know whether changing things would make any difference because they haven’t tried. Not arguing with you and your response is welcome, but I am bothered when another company in a similar space does make more of an effort.
Nice response and points well made, so thanks.

Haggis, you might just be surprised at the level of experience some have on this board regarding marketing, web design and large scale project management. I can assure you that I can more than hold my own in this department. As a general rule of thumb, when little things are being missed it’s because someone either can’t be bothered, is too busy, can’t afford to rectify it or doesn’t feel it’s worthwhile. AFC can afford it and it’s definitely worthwhile, so we’re left with can’t be bothered and too busy, or both. At the point the company overlook these it’s generally time to bring in someone to sort it out. Only my opinion, but the point of info and contact should reflect the company, and in this case it does, unfortunately. I’m allowed to be critical of a company without de-ramping. Minimal cost, maximum exposure. I’d even do it free of charge but they don’t reply to my emails. It simply isn’t acceptable that a company with this tech doesn’t even try to sell itself. I’m sure you’ll hate my post, which is your right, but AFC are an engineering/tech company which has an outdated, boring website. I guess if they want to look outdated and boring it’s ok though. Personally I’d prefer them to look and feel as though they care about the environment, the planet and their customers.

It’s these details which annoy me. No-one bothers to sort them out but it’s the point of contact for the company and it looks and feels clunky and outdated.

Bloom also have a good looking website, which we don’t. Mentioned because there has been some recent discussion about ours, which does look a bit rubbish in comparison and is a cheap and easy fix. Not sure why someone hasn’t sorted it already.

Bloom energy not AFC.

CB, that’s rubbish. I’ve seen several rampy comments removed from there. It’s actually pretty balanced and certainly better without you.

Boris certainly needs a positive news story this morning.

I haven’t seen TKBear do much wrong yet. Give him/her a chance.

Nick, and why I like ABB, which like MACE will have pretty strict deadlines for AFC to stick to, which benefits everyone.

DW, what happened to your username, it has changed?

I don’t think any holder minds being wrong or indeed reading genuine criticism of the company. What does bother me is the repetition, day after day. Garonne, Number, Ade, Blockme are probably the same person or working together. I’ve no idea whether it works as a tactic or whether paid rampers/derampers are an actual thing; I just know that it kills genuine debate and causes friction. If someone posts the same thing every day, despite being asked to reign it in a bit, then says that they will and are only doing it out of concern, has an agenda and it shouldn’t be acceptable.
I accept the price drop which is across many sectors and whilst I’m not ‘delighted’ at the progress this year, it has still been very good. Still a risk but all to play for as we head into 2022.

I see that the wolf pack have graced us with their presence.

I see that Ade’s spelling has improved. Absolutely no doubt that the four of you are one and the same, or at the very least, working together. Dangerous game to play fella’s.

There’s another one. Coincidence?

And as if by magic, he appears.

In fact I’d go further and guess that you, Garonne and Ade (with his contrived spelling mistakes and grammar) are one and the same.

You’re correct, it will, but your enthusiasm for it speaks volumes. I ain’t your bro either. I only have one and he’s a genuine hero.
You are ‘yellow’ but it’s taken me a while to figure that out.

I’m pretty chilled thanks, but ‘lol’ isn’t a term I’d expect from a genuine holder.
You: same garbage about holding and trading whilst almost euphoric about price drops.
Garonne: Posting negativity day after day after day.
Ade: See above, but a know-it-all.
It’s uncanny how often the other two appear together on here. Suddenly we’re in the 40’s and they’ve gone quiet.
Maybe you all work for Schroders?

Number, there’s no way on earth that you’re holding long term and trading a separate account. Trading only imo. In fact, you remind me of ‘yellowf1’ in many ways. Which shareholder in their right mind would be hoping for further drops? You must think we’re stupid.