Dazpink.15 Oct 2020 14:49
Cannot argue with your latest comments, Dazpink...coincides with my own train of thought regarding AGM and its future prospects.
Still maintain what I remarked on previously though:-
"But they (VRS, AGM, Directa Plus, Haydale) are little more than research companies at the moment...and companies which don't generate a great amount of revenue either".
Out of all the above companies (I am invested in AGM, Directa Plus and Haydale...used to be in VRS) I favour AGM...and also Haydale for various other reasons also.
Why? Because they (especially AGM) specialize in "dispersals". In my opinion this is where these small companies have the best chance to become self-reliant as far as generating steadily increasing revenue is concerned.
That, and again...only my opinion, is why VRS are struggling. They claim to be the only accredited producer of properly defined Graphene...so what?
Even if this was a recognized fact it would make no great difference to them.
1. They could not produce it in any large amounts even if that was the case...the cost would be prohibitive.
2. The production of "graphene" will come in varying forms; I doubt if everything that benefits from the addition of graphene, on any scale, will have to be graphene in its purest form. Something very close to absolute graphene, which can be produced quickly and a lot more cheaply, will most likely do in many cases.
But producing it in tonnages? A pipe dream for small companies. Anyone, whatever process they devise or use, will need a lot (an awful lot!) of money to mass produce graphene.