Member Info for Saucysausage

B-2-0 Talking absolute nonsense as always.

Black swan anyone?

Rainbow you get madder as each day passes.

We can clearly see that SN appears to be funding his personal defense in Texas. I know Lifeishard and others take SN active defense in the Vicky case as a positive sign, but it is worth keeping in mind when following these cases that by contrast, as the public record and the liquidators’ updates indicate, there has been no corresponding funding or concrete action from him to support or reverse FRC’s liquidation despite his earlier statements saying he would do so.

==================

Oopsie.

The phrasing "having a life’s" seems a bit unclear—did you mean "having a life" or perhaps something like "having a life goal"? I’ll assume you’re asking whether someone can have a goal of simply "having a life" and address that. If you meant something else, please clarify, and I’ll tailor the response.

1.

Yes, someone can absolutely have a goal of "having a life," though it’s a broad and subjective aim. Here’s why it can make sense as a goal:

2.

Pursuing Fulfillment: For some, "having a life" means building a meaningful existence—balancing relationships, personal growth, hobbies, and experiences. It’s a goal rooted in prioritizing well-being over specific achievements like career or wealth.

3.

Escaping Constraints: People stuck in demanding routines (e.g., overworking, caregiving, or survival mode) might see "having a life" as reclaiming freedom, time, or joy. It’s a valid aspiration when life feels like it’s on hold.

4.

Vague but Human: While abstract, the goal reflects a universal desire for purpose or balance. It’s less about a concrete endpoint and more about a state of being—feeling alive, engaged, or content.

On the flip side, critics might argue it’s too vague to be a "real" goal, as it lacks measurable outcomes. Without specificity (e.g., "I want to travel yearly" or "I want to spend more time with family"), it can be hard to act on or assess progress.

Still, it’s a deeply human aspiration, especially for those feeling deprived of personal time or meaning. If you’re asking about making this a practical goal or have a specific context (e.g., financial planning for a freer life), let me know, and I can dig deeper or even check relevant discussions on X or the web for real-world perspectives

Discussing a suspended share can still have value, depending on your goals:

•

Understanding the Suspension: Analyzing why the share was suspended (e.g., regulatory issues, pending news, or financial irregularities) can provide insights into the company’s health or market dynamics. This can inform future investment decisions.

•

Speculative Opportunities: If you’re a speculative investor, discussing potential outcomes (e.g., resumption of trading, acquisition, or bankruptcy) might help you prepare for opportunities or risks once the suspension lifts.

•

Learning and Strategy: Engaging in discussions can sharpen your understanding of market mechanics, suspension triggers, and how other investors react, which is useful for building long-term strategies.

•

Limited Actionability: On the downside, you can’t trade a suspended share, so discussions may not lead to immediate actionable steps. The lack of new price data also limits technical analysis.

If you’re focused on immediate trading, discussions might feel pointless until trading resumes. But if you’re in it for learning or long-term positioning, there’s merit in exploring the situation. Want me to look into a specific suspended share for more context?

It disappeared.

Like RR's money

Based on the available information, there is no clear identification of a specific individual named "Jonahb" associated with the London Stock Exchange (LSE) forums or related contexts. The search results primarily focus on discussions about the London Stock Exchange Group PLC (LSEG) stock, share chat forums, and various LSE-related academic or student forums, but none explicitly mention a user or person named "Jonahb." Here are some relevant points:

•

LSE Share Chat Forums: Websites like Investing.com, London South East (lse.co.uk), and ADVFN host active forums where investors discuss LSEG stock and other market-related topics. These forums often feature pseudonymous usernames, and "Jonahb" could be a username used by an anonymous participant. However, no specific posts or profiles under this name were referenced in the provided data.

•

LSE Academic Forums: The London School of Economics (LSE) has various forums, such as the Forum for Philosophy or the Legal and Political Theory Forum, but these are academic in nature and unlikely to feature a casual username like "Jonahb."

•

Potential Misinterpretation: The query might refer to a typo, a specific thread, or a niche community not captured in the provided results. Alternatively, "Jonahb" could be a lesser-known or private user not highlighted in public discussions.

If "Jonahb" is a username on an LSE-related forum (e.g., lse.co.uk or ADVFN), you could check those platforms directly by searching for the username in their share chat sections. Without more specific details (e.g., a particular post or thread), I can’t pinpoint who "Jonahb" is. If you have additional context, such as the forum platform or a specific topic they discussed, please provide it, and I can dig deeper!

an enigma!

heheh

Can you get someone banned from a website for being a troll?

Getting someone banned from a website for trolling depends on the website’s rules and moderation policies. Most platforms, like X or Reddit, have guidelines against harassment, spam, or disruptive behavior. If the trolling violates these rules, you can report the user through the website’s reporting system, providing evidence like screenshots or links to offending posts. Moderators will review and decide on actions, which could include warnings, suspensions, or bans.

You can’t directly ban someone yourself unless you’re a moderator or admin. If the trolling is severe (e.g., threats or illegal content), you could also contact the website’s support team or, in extreme cases, law enforcement. However, outcomes depend on the platform’s enforcement consistency and the severity of the behavior. If you’re dealing with a specific case and want to check a user’s activity, I can analyze their X profile or posts for context—would you like me to do that?

Can you get someone banned for being a troll for posting the same post you yourself posted on another share?

Getting someone banned for reposting content you shared depends on the website’s rules. Most platforms, like X, don’t explicitly prohibit reposting unless it involves plagiarism, harassment, or spam. If the user is reposting your content verbatim without credit, you could report it for intellectual property violation or spam, especially if it’s excessive or disruptive. However, reposting alone typically isn’t enough for a ban unless it violates specific guidelines, like targeted harassment or bot-like behavior.

You’d need to report the user through the platform’s reporting tools, providing evidence like links to the original and reposted content. Moderators will review based on their policies. If you’re referring to a specific post or user on X, I can check their activity for context—would you like me to analyze the post or user profile?

Hmmmmm......

HEHEHHE

Did somebody say something?

LOLS

Just an utter car crash for the past however many years where do you even start!

The fact people are still waiting for what Fridays 'update' might look like.... DESPITE having just learned that he BS'itted the entire 18 months backstory tells all you need to know as to why fraudsters keep fraud'in

This is so clearly, evidently and demonstrably false, inaccurate and downright fraud... yet still people WANT to believe.

There is literally no saving some people.

Personally I am really looking forward to a nice clear update, that explains all this silly fuss before that caused the delay. Poor Amit, you have to feel for him being messed around by other people so much.

I'm Spartacus

Lol.

Might be worth asking her if she has any idea what her husband has done with our money?

==================

Knock yourself out fella.

28th April announcement still reads like this from the preview screen on the press and media tab. However when you click 'View here' you get the message below....

Oh dear Amit. Oh deary me.

Pre-announcement Business Update

The DaaP buyer is one of the world’s largest and most respected healthcare companies. Founded in the United States, it operates globally across three major sectors: pharmaceuticals, medical, and consumer health, and has proudly increased its dividend every year for the past 63 years.

======================

To

-=====================================

The DaaP buyer is a Healthcare company.

Their formal announcement is subject to final corporate approval.

Hiya Rainbow.

Oh yeah, that's right. Because Tyson got up from the floor that time, you;re convinces this fraud isn't a fraud.

Makes perfect sense my friend.

I see your logic.

Just lols

Black Swan anyone?

Just lols

5. Current Status & Valuation (Jul 2025)

As of July 2025, the market cap stands at a paltry £2m, representing a catastrophic 99.4% loss from its listing highs. Trading is currently suspended, reflecting the company’s weakened position. After a rollercoaster of a ride, the company is suffering from the consequences of the past years, and the only thing at an all-time high is investor distrust.

Sometimes yesterday’s winners become the losers of tomorrow, let this be a lesson – take profits when you can, don’t let yourself be railed in by high-emotion telegram groups, Twitter “experts” and the bloke down the street who’s just ten bagged and is certain he knows the next best thing. Sit down, do your research, and find value in whatever you are investing in.

==========

Just lols

Do shut up.

More boring than Rainbow.

LOL