Member Info for Saucysausage

FRR Inside man: SN went to the toilet today and bought some cakes at his local shop.

Rainbow: Will this action affect Deloitte closing out?

Just lols

,I will be gutted holding 200 million shares

---------

I wouldn't be boasting about how monumentally stupid id been.

Lols.

Lol

Ohhh man. Cheers Steve. I thought my trading platform was broken. Thankfully you updated us in a timely fashion.

Awwww. He's taking his ball away.

I'm gonna block you all.

Bwahahahaha

You're obviously upsetting him.

===========

hhehee

Every keyboard warrior in the world acts tuff behind their keyboard.

Classic little spotty nerd.

Big man attitude and anger issues too.

bwahah

Perhaps she deed

You're *

I will sit and wait for this to totally end before I give up

-----

Didn't have to wait long then rainbow.

Lols.

COMING SOON.

I am so excited.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLS

Time tells all tales Smelly, all tales.

===================

Stop talking absolute rubbish RR.

You're wrong of course, but even if you wasn't..... you don't really seem to understand what a god awful company FFR was. Or that it was run by a compulsive liar, fraud and thief.

Keep dreamin' RR. Keep dreamin'

Just LOLS>

We already have RR.

I read it as they are willing to deal,

============

of course you do. Because you are basically in so deep they could say SN shat in the moth of someone and you'd think it was a good sign.

Absolute Tard.

I crossed checked my assumptions for logic and accuracy and I can confirm that the answer to "how does inventory monetisation work with SYME?" is simple.

It doesn't

=================

just lols

Admin, can you please advise why the link to the Beyond SPX article was deleted.

=================

LOL

You think they're gonna reply to you?

Who agrees.

-----------------

no.

My wallet and bank account could do with a lift Lady Mapp 🙏

--------------------------

You and everyone you conned into following you with your RR account.

Please accept this communication as a formal clarification regarding the non-dissemination of the electronic correspondence which, by prior implication or expectation, then may have been anticipated by yourself or other relevant stakeholders.

Then upon thorough retrospective examination and due consideration of the prevailing circumstances, it then has become evident that the aforementioned email was not, in fact, dispatched. Then this omission, while ostensibly inadvertent, was precipitated by a confluence of operational contingencies and prioritisation dynamics which, in aggregate, rendered the act of transmission impracticable within the originally envisaged timeframe.

Then It is imperative to note that said omission does not, and should not, be construed as a reflection of disregard, negligence, or wilful non-compliance, but rather as a temporary deferment necessitated by the exigencies of concurrent obligations and the overarching imperative to ensure accuracy, relevance, and then contextual appropriateness of the intended content.

Doug

Just LOLS

Victims