Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
I personally have no doubt, based on what he said recently, that he meant late in the last Q4 of the calendar year, not fiscal year.
If the expected news is delayed until close to the end of the fiscal year, that means another six months wait for the MET and updated resource figures.
I doubt any of the shareholders would be happy with that. In fact they would be apoplectic with rage if that were the case and they would rightly wonder whose interests the company would be serving to the exclusion of the private investors.
Just nine trading days, including today before the new year.
As they say in Tswana, it's 'ketla ragoga se bona' time. Get yer fingers out!
Beeshoney how do you KNOW that "people in the know putting another million in"?
A polite request. Please read your posts before you submit them. I, and I expect many others, have trouble trying to comprehend the point you are attempting to make.
I shall be going tonight.
CBS are you going?
I think there's supposed to be a decimal point between the 0 and the 6!
Oh dear, back to the beta blockers.
I'll be there Blackrhino as well. Good to rub noses with you and CBS again.
Jaytem please filter the idiot.
GB33 his answer was so unconvincing!
And that $614m NPV based on the PFS without the 2018 drilling results, wasn't it? So it could be 20%+ higher?
And with preferably at least a 7 on the left hand side of the zeros.
Well, I can dream, can't I? ??
Penquin2 why don't you just go onto the company's website and do a little research yourself?
TDT
When I posted a few months ago, "Right product, right place, right time, wrong board ..... as in directors", you thought it was a little harsh.
Do you still think that? (The purpose of asking that question is not in any way meant to be argumentative or to score any points.)
I firmly believe that RY and the BoD are dancing to a tune played by entities unknown whose strategy is to take us out for as little as possible. The BoD will, I am sure, be 'taken care of' for their cooperation.
A lot of what has happened over the last 18 or more months stinks. Unfortunately, it is only after a passage of time as more pieces of the puzzle begin to reveal the true picture that the benefit of hindsight is revealed.
To me it seems that the pieces of the puzzle is not revealing a 'rose garden' of comfortable retirement but more an arid desert with not much of an oasis in sight.
Brian Savage is not the Chairman, Robert Schafer is. Both are non-executives.
intenebris I shall be there if it's in London and I am not recovering from more surgery which I'm waiting to hear about shortly.
They won't name the asset manager because it's Neil Woodford! :-(( :-))
Thanks TDT.
I assume they'll be issuing an RNS to clarify that so there's no confusion.
TDT was that confirmation in reply to your question via an e-mail?
Three words describe that RNS.
"Patronising, platitudinous and mushrooms."
ftsedow, we all know it's not an overnight job. That's absolutely no excuse for not releasing the 2018 drill results.
There is virtually nothing in there that we did not know or expect.
Nothing more than a bit of waffle to shut us up and to stem the number of e-mails to the company.
Why couldn't the 2018 drill results have been announced? It is not in the interest of entities unknown to have them released.
The TEO to be submitted in December '20. That means we shall trundle along at these price levels for another 15 months ... unless the road financing or some sort of investment in AMC is confirmed .
R du R
In my opinion that is a pretty realistic assessment of the current situation hence me posting after the last RNS announcing the appointment of DG Infratech that there wouldn't be any major share price enhancing news before the end of this year.
There are too many people with over optimistically flared nostrils posting on this board expecting imminent seismic news mainly because of the involvement of the Chinese. I agree that they would not want to be wasting their time on a project that may be a dead duck. But their involvement should never be assumed that this is a done deal yet. Remember as R du R pointed out, that there is a time limit to their Agreement which allows them to cut their ties with GCM if they wish. And if they do, what would that tell you about their confidence of getting the "GL" as soon as they would like it?
Giving DG Infratech 5% of the company on the achievement of their first milestone is surely an indication of how much that may be an obstacle - a surmountable one, but nevertheless, an obstacle.
On another tangental point, I have always been a bit suspicious of the arrangement with Dyani, a small office with only one or two staff? What could they possibly achieve that the Chinese couldn't with all their influence and close relationship through the BRI with the GoB?
Just some of my thoughts. Feel free to disagree, but please offer some sensible rationale for doing so.
I am still holding and hoping to reap the benefits of my patience within the next year.
I can't see anything of any significance happening before the end of this year.