Member Info for Sangijuelas1

I don't know about the stock reaching bottom but I think you certainly have.

The oncology results were nothing special. It was just a case of maybe worth doing further investigation.

Anyone that believed they were the greatest results ever seen can't have been very well informed.

Remember Longevity was supposed to be finding a Chinese company to target

Indeed RP, Chardan and Oliveira had quite a colourful rep for launching dodgy Chinese companies as SPACs

Anyone that wanted to go short that knew about the Oxford terms was through on goal with only the keeper to beat.

The thing is Bluebelly the info on the dire cash position seems to be clear in the annual report.

My main concern was always whether or not the $7.5m from Oxford that could not be spent had to be deducted from the year end cash balance. The way it was worded seems slightly unclear but reading it again the other day it seems clearer that it did need to be deducted and is so stated.

I wonder whether their shareholding bought at 110p influenced their decision to avoid raising funds last year as that would have meant dilution at a lower price than what they bought at. Did they act in the best interest of the company as a whole?

There was also an asymmetry of information regarding disclosure of the loan terms. UK shareholders were not made aware that the loan terms had been published in an SEC filing, whereas US investors like Oliveira would have known.

They basically mortgaged the company for $5m cash to play with. And then paid a high interest rate on the full amount of $12.5m despite having to keep $7.5m in cash.

I believe their motive for this was to make them look less desperate when approaching the market to raise funds. But it backfired.

Sunny do you own the shares in your name or do you hold them on an investment platform.

If on a platform you are not the registered shareholder

You are not going to be able to raise money. Google Sahara for Biotech for the FT article

Porky got caught posting with a fake account on 4D.

Do not listen to him.

WALK OUT THE DOOR

Porky has just led the sheep at 4D to ruin.

He is the Pied Piper.

GET OUT NOW

Before the Nasdaq listing the ramping was feverish. I said listing on Nasdaq will not cause any rise as it meant nothing and I was accused of deramping when I was just being realistic.

At the end of the day people prefer to hear from grifting rampers like Porky, Rocket79 and Magmanus

No Porky I always offered a balanced view. If I ever said something negative it was pounced on and I was accused of selling.

I was very clear for 2 months that the Oxford loan was bad and that I believed that they were at risk of running out of cash.

All my posts are here for anyone to see. I am not like your second account Taunton Boy that was deleted when I reported it to the mods

Better to be a mark than a grifter

I sometimes wonder what 4D were employing Image Box Communications for.

I know Tiziana had paid shills on Stocktwits

I mean with a stock like this it's very hard to make informed decisions from objective info outlining the pros and cons. Generally all there is is the company news and Proactive puff pieces.

If I am thinking of investing in say Ocado it is easy to get a wide range of views from people pointing out the problems as well as others highlighting the positives.

Recently it was really difficult to tell how many genuine posters there were here and how many were **** posting from multiple accounts or paid promoters

You don't need to tell me. I was on here raising concerns since the beginning of April and was regularly abused by the likes of Porky.

Didn't care as don't care what people think of me. Did the same on Tils, SNG and Hemo
Also Avacta which I think is another disaster waiting to happen

It's cult like behaviour and they prey on the vulnerable.

Yeah I pay no attention to analysts.

Funnily enough Aim 2 posters here late last week who were ramping 4D also turned up there.

Sound like professionals