RE: Valuation14 Apr 2023 13:09
Con - If you thought I was being critical, I apologise for that was not my intention. I was simply attempting to understand the logic. I was concerned that I had misunderstood. I fully understand the expression "low ball". As to your comment, it all depends on the view point you take. If I were a fund manager say for Prudential, then I would be looking at anything up to 50 years for the capital to come back. After all, at the Pru they receive new funds to invest on a daily basis. If, on the other hand, I were a "chancer" investing for short term profit, perhaps 10 minutes in KMR may be too long. I was trying to understand where you stood. For myself, I am a long term investor in KMR and being based in UK, have to absorb the withholding tax. I therefore value retained profits and net capital growth over a longer term far more highly than yearly dividends. I appreciate that this will not suit all investors. I think the right suitor will come along and perhaps quite soon now that the wrinkles have been resolved and positive cash balances start to appear.