RE: Poor results11 Jan 2018 11:04
I suspect there may be some anomalies in the figures reported which bear further examination.
It was anticipated by some that the net debt would have declined by amounts in excess of the $10.7M reported. However, this is but one figure from net assets and should not be considered as a great indication of profitability, or lack of it. Taken with the figures in the Finance Update, net debt has declined to $34.1M, a reduction of $14.7M. It is getting better!
The production for 2017 totals 1,080,300 tonnes of finished product. Shipments totalled 1,040,400 tonnes. This indicates an increase in finished stock of 40,100 tonnes, adding say, $5.0M to the value of net assets.
Additionally, during the final weeks it was reported that there was a substantial amount of activity dockside. This could indicate higher volume of shipments leading to higher values of trade debtors.
The signs are that there is profit, if less than some expected. But at least the disasters of the doomsayers have seemingly been avoided. The question will be whether or not the profit return will be sufficient for the major shareholders or will they say "Enough is enough, let us find some other group of individuals to take this mediocre performing business forward?" My money would be on the latter as the management have not performed to expectations. A typical out-turn when miners run a mining company and not businessmen.