Member Info for rustybucket

for those invested in blinks in the later stages price corrections were not that common.

It was perpetually pulled down by gravity. Hopefully longer term this will be different. Next update, hopefully this month will be crucial, not just for the next quarterly results, but for the projections going forward, if they are good then this has plenty of upside.

Hi Lawrence13. It was years ago, and cellulitis, still got the scars, but okay now, Thank you. The type of trades I am alluding to are always "A" trades, which men they are traded as soon as the price is hit.

Say a price is 27p with a spread of 26.9 to 27.1 . A company may want to buy shares as low as possible, so if the price goes up they may then load the sell side to bring the price lower, you might think this is counter productive, but on the order book the market makers can see sells such as stop losses at even lower prices, and can gobble them up.

Google market makers using algorithms ( and it will explain better than I am doing ) These can also be computer traded,
I have spent over 10 hours watching the sell side just spewing out "A" AUTOMATIC TRADES, and once the order has been filled, then the price moves dramatically. Bearing in mind there are a number of shorts on POG, they have a vested interest is buying back those shares at the cheapest possible price.

The "A" TRADES generally do not work when the spread is larger.

That these are also trades.

04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 100 Sell* 26.80 26.95 26.80 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 100 Sell* 26.80 26.95 26.80 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 100 Sell* 26.80 26.95 26.80 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 1,000 Sell* 26.80 26.95 268.00 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 200 Sell* 26.80 26.95 53.60 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 100 Sell* 26.80 26.95 26.80 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 400 Sell* 26.80 26.95 107.20 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 200 Sell* 26.80 26.95 53.60 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 1,200 Sell* 26.80 26.95 321.60 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 500 Sell* 26.80 26.95 134.00 A
04-Mar-21 16:28:33 26.80 200 Sell* 26.80 26.95 53.60

I studied these for months, as a premium member when I was laid up after being in hospital. And would love someone to disprove my theory. It happened every time, you could see the market makers just waiting to pick off certain trades, once out the way WHOOSH. A couple of days later an RNS.

It happened about a month ago with Norges bank. Lets see what happens. Always interesting when you have ended this, to see which way the tide turns, and normally quickly.

evoking, don't be ridiculous, who would buy 1 shire for 27p then pay commission of £s.

Another one living in cloud cuckoo land.

I have for years said this type of trading, is also trading designed to stop the flow of proper trading. Some do say they are codes, people have said that they have known market makers personally and this is in correct.

All I know is that when these type of trades are about, it is generally designed to keep the share price suppressed. I noticed the last couple of days towards the end of the day, the price has also went down.

Queer things definitely going on with share price, and normally within a few days of this, there is normally a holding RNS. Lets See.

This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view
This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view
This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view
This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view

UDF, I think if you read his post, the gluttonous greed he is referring to is you ??? As for dividends, you say you are an accountant, ? Well, in my opinion the time to think about dividends, is when you generate a formula for repaying $500m of debt that is due in just over 12 months and NOT BEFORE.

We should be generating as much cash as possible to try and repay some of these bonds when due, and then look to try and get a reduced bond issue at a lower coupon rate. Once they do that , then they can talk about dividends. As for you point on the amount of shareholders, the share price is considerably lower, so they can start off at a " token dividend " and build from that, not repeating mistakes from bygone years when they paid a dividend when they were in trouble, Not a good strategy.

dynaheir, The only reason Radium posts on the other board, Is the tit comes on this board to disrupt, it, he has a n agenda, full stop. It has said it has shares in the other share, so Radium1 is just getting his own back for the disruptive tone of him many inane ramblings.

I for one filtered it years ago, as I was sick of his utter garbage, designed to cause carnage.

I have no ill will to any other shareholders or posters, but you reap what you sow, and what comes around goes around.

brand, I have never come on any board, trying to belittle people or upset people. I might challenge what people say, but that does promote some action on this board.

I won't repeat what I said about delusional, but will challenge anyone who says there was 95% dilution. Because there was not. I provided my FACTS, I am still waiting for UDF,s facts to dis-prove me.

Onwards, and maybe one day, Upwards.

Hi, 1noise, thats fine. At the end of the day, we hopefully, all want the same thing. An increase in the share price.

But have you worked on POGS operation and seen exactly what those employees do.

Lawrence13, I have no idea what Strukhov wants, Karim, is just Strukhovs puppet. Strukhov has no where near enough shares to make the decisions and I don't think the new CEO WOULD COME IN IF HE FEARED the company was not moving forwards.

As for Pavel, Pavel has been accused before albeit again by people who had an axe to grind, but, the prophet stations seemed reasonable at the time in relation to Pavel wanting to be paid for arranging a bond issue at a higher rate than new bod said they could get. As for the sale of the property, often accountants don't take full responsibility for their reports thats why there is often disclaimers.

In my opinion, you should have an open mind, as if he has tried to sell his assets to the company at grossly inflated prices he deserves to be taken to task. If he is proved innocent, then thats fine.

I agree with you that he is innocent till proven guilty, and I think he should be on bail, rather than being incarcerated, unless there is a very good reason to suggest he would abscond.

UDF, tell me, are you qualified to say that and by that I mean to say they have 1000 excess staff. I would suggest you are not. You have so much confidence in Denis, surely he will not let you down.

Good Luck small trader, better at 26p than 30p upwards

Just sent this e mail to PR department. SHOCKING, in my opinion.

Hi Patrick,

Very disappointed to see investor presentation on Website, before this has been advised in an RNS,

It is very disconcerting to be advised by another investor who has accidentally found it.

The silence from the PR team had been deafening, and very poor public relations. in my opinion.

I believe it is an EXCELLENT PRESENTATION, and one the company should be promoting, and would be interested to hear your views of why you are not doing this.

Interestingly ratings agency treat pre payment of gold as debt, They also take into account guarantee made to IRC. No wonder Pavel was so keen to "give away" IRC to try and remove the debt, False economy in my opinion. That will please Retired Banker, and Kenj, who hopefully is still around. Positive is we have paid off another $50m of the pre pay..

Exactly as I said Lawrence13 "negative, is, I believe we should have had an RNS advising us." Shocking PR, UDF advised they were all on training. Maybe training to put out a RNS about what I believe is a MUCH, MUCH, MORE POSITIVE update than the last one we got.

It also highlights the need to process OUR OWN CONCENTRATE, Rather than third party which makes you wonder why Pioneer was put back.

I don't think the presentation is a presentation that Strukhov will like as it goes against 2 of the things he has campaigned for. Dividends and third party concentrate

WELL SPOTTED SMALL TRADER, Well worth a read,

Interesting comments that negatives from ratings agencies, are Dividend payments, and not addressing bond maturity 1 year before due, which both of them I agree with. Personally I think it is VERY VERY positive, negative, is, I believe we should have had an RNS advising us.

But I think once people and analysts have a read of this, there WILL be an increase in share price. Time will tell.

Which staff were getting retrained, I read, Denis was getting to know the company ( In my opinion as the CEO of a competitor ) he should have known a lot about the company already ) I heard nothing about Re-training. ??

Sorry small Trader not radar, stupid computer. I will NEVER EVER, see the logic of a post that says, I might but in over 30p, when the prevailing price is 26p. RIDICULOUS, I want to buy in at the lowest price possible, as there is more opportunity for making money.