Member Info for RudolphToo

Call me picky but it's "anyone who". Whom is used in place of words like me or him. You wouldn't say "him has information" you would use "he" so therefore it's "who". Think "to whom" or "from whom" or "with whom". No offence meant.

Thanks for allowing me to "post away", didn't realise you were promoted to team captain. I don't have personal issues with the management, they are patently very poor at executing whatever their strategy is, issuing new shares whenever they run out of cash. Institutions are I'm told holding 80% here so time for some new brooms to exploit this technology that is so highly thought of but has to be sold at a loss.

I'm sure you'd like me to just go away but if you or anyone have a problem with my post you can report it if you want. Otherwise I will continue posting. If people don't want to hear it, they don't have to read it.

No other shares then, no unfounded posts. As for insulting the management, grow up. They are useless spendthrifts. I take it you've bought back in so ramp away. As for holders of DGB, blame the management not me.

No new material contracts, they must be announced asap. Can't be held back.And where's my apology Kiwi.. again what other shares, what unfounded deramping?

Excuse me Kiwi, wtf are you talking about, what other shares, what unfounded deramping.

Sorry to rub salt in your wound afrc but I think Kiwi and I are having, by bulletin board standards a civilised and respectful exchange. Sorry to speak I'll of the dead/dying. A poster on Advfn sums up the position very well I think by saying that without more money dgb are insolvent and accounts can't be signed off until funds are raised. The institutions will be playing hardball to get in cheap. So forget 15p Kiwi mate, I'm staying away. Tooo risky for me.

There's a fraction for you Kiwi_. 1/8 in a day. Can't believe you will take a punt on this turning out ok, are you bluffing or did you have in mind another fraction like a half. At some point this is worth something but at the moment it's a pig in a poke certainly not worth £35M . Could de-list or go private and save some fees. I would want the II's to boot out the management before I invested. They are pretty useless, living on a reputation from the past and paying themselves loads. Sorry for anyone caught holding this dog.

Kiwi 'The company will announce results for the financial year ended 31 March 2017 in September 2017'. I missed this tucked away at the end of the last contract announcement, fell off my chair laughing at the bit that said sale was at lower margins than usual if I recall. That's what's wrong with this company, their margins are rubbish.

It was an ordinary trade according to Stock exchange website. For some reason this site shows most of trades as delayed reporting

Thanks for the master class on spread betting master36, I'm much obliged to you but I'll stick to investing thanks and that means not taking a punt without some good reason. I'm sophisticated enough to see this for what it is thanks. I see from your recent posts elsewhere that you are a trader who sells after a a 20-30% spike, perhaps you are annoyed that my giving my negative opinion might reduce your chances of a profit. I'm guessing your tactic is to talk up the price and sell out just before the result, nevermind, you'll find another.

No idea what that means but whatever, don't care.

Substitute the words "more likely than not" then instead of guaranteed. I've never shorted a share and wouldn't know how. My share dealing account only allows sales of shares you own.

You have absolutely no evidence that news is coming next week unless you are guilty of insider trading and if that was the case you would be buying all you can. As for 747 codes, what are you on. You aren't qualified to give advice so how dare you tell people not to sell their shares if they wish to limit their risk. Those over £22000 worth of chicken feed traded last week are people in danger of losing their hard earned money if this dog is suspended which becomes a possibility with each day that passes. It wouldn't be the first time people have posted buy/hold recommendations in order for them to jump the queue for selling. Is that your plan? As for institutional shareholders, none could sell without starting an avalanche as they would have to declare. Maybe they will kick out this useless management, that's the best option if a fundraising goes ahead.

Oh and by the way, facial recognition is now being used in Chinese supermarkets for verifying identity. Not DGB but Alibaba, the Chinese Ebay.

Why do I feel it is very strange to see a blogger constantly promoting a certain business that by any measure of investment quality is likely to lose money and is the only stock he /she mentions. I know of many posters who are paid to promote certain stocks and often work in a team echoing each others positive posts and shouting down a contrary view. I also know of other sad posters who fell for a story a few years ago, paid a much higher price than today and are looking for a bigger fool to sell their shares to. I'm not altruistic, my only motive is to pay no more than the price I think is fair based on known facts not a meaningless hope that because the price was 200p 4yrs ago it will get back to that soon, at least 4 times as many shares in circulation now. This board is for discussion and my view is as valid as any other. Just saying.

As we approach the inevitable publication of the delayed year end results, some might try to pump up the volume. Why would they? Maybe they are paid to type stuff about DGB; maybe they are just ordinary investors who regret buying here as DGB consistently lose money and have to raise more capital; maybe they just want to share the news about how great DGB is. Really? There isn't any good news. If there was any material change to the company's situation then it must be published, it can't be held back it's the law. So a distinct risk of the accounts showing less cash than the £3M left at the interims and probably a fund raising. Hang onto your money, too risky.

Just read about the situation at Telit with their CEO resigning. An interesting quote from Paul Scott on Stocko "What fascinates me is how many investors (Institutions, just as much as PIs) will believe what they want to believe. So, you often see bulls strongly defend a stock, and buy more, even when presented with irrefutable evidence that something is badly wrong." Makes me think.

Hi Kiwi, on the surface it seems Ok modest valuation, about £3m net cash 4% dividend, compares well with it's peers. Main downside is the cyclic nature of the business, but if you want a structural engineering company this could be it but prepare for a long term hold, not very liquid. SP dived 4 years ago, presumably on a profit warning with state of the economy, shame we didn't catch its recovery not sure how much room left for growth.

Looks interesting, I will look into it further asap. Thanks for the heads up.