Member Info for Rudey

Whilst releasing information into the public domain may be of interest to shareholders looking to sell, it is not in the interests of those holding for the longer term. Lots of price sensitive information is legally held onto in order to protect the company from hostile takeover, something that posters on here in my opinion don't seem to be considering.

Very unlikely on all fronts Ginger.

What are you then Ginger? Another disgruntled UKOG shareholder? A jealous RBD investor? Probably one of the 'keep it in the ground' brigade. Whichever you are, you come across as a bit of a saddo.

Why is Pbrain posting on here? Are you now a UJO shareholder?

Good posts Gazza.
PDMS - incorrect.

35625 divided by 375 = the % of dipshlts on this bb

It's hilarious, isn't it. You provide the facts and figures so fellow posters can make more informed decisions, but when it comes down to it the only language so many on here (like webvan) can understand is nonsense interrupted by obscenities.

You're right Mix. I shouldn't bother with this crap really, but when I DO force myself to look in, I can't help but post something to protect my investment and the people I know who deserve respect. And like you, if it goes tits up I'll blame the person who invested my money - ME.

cont.

7,000,000,000 shares issued in 8 months! (and the price has risen from 0.08 in that time).
If you truly believe he doesn't know any of the placees then you are delusional. (you stated mates in the city - he has nothing to do with the city apart from brokers)
If you bought in after biscathorpe initial results Feb/March you would be sitting on next to no profit now, where is the share holder value? (in April the share price was half what it is now - 100% profit - and you say there is no shareholder value!)

I was hoping you weren't going to ask me, oiler. I've got better things to do, but I'll take that post as an example. You posted:

You have to question DB's happy clapping gang, people claiming to know more than everyone and claiming to be LTH, (I have held UJO shares for over 5 years)
people trying to justify the SP falling from .29 on volumetrics (the previous day's close was 0.25 and following the start of the dump of shares closed at 0.23 that day)
and a very substantial placing at 0.15 are clearly daytraders. (I don not day trade, I've got more sense)
So can you prove DB had no choice to raise £5m (over 25% of the mcap)? (RBD had just raised £10m - £12m specifically for West Newton, that meant UJO would require well over £4m)
Why not £2.5m placing for immediate cash and an open offer for £2.5m? (UJO don't need immediate cash and many of the existing PI's who would participate in the placing would dump them back on the market looking for a quick profit - DB was targeting institutional investors)
We had been told £2.5m cash, EWT paid for and could cover the cost of one more drill. (where's this from?)
7,000,000,000 shares issued in 8 months! (and the price has risen from 0.08 in that time.
If you truly believe he doesn't know any of the placees then you are delusional.
If you bought in after biscathorpe initial results Feb/March you would be sitting on next to no profit now, where is the share holder value?

oiler, your posts are full of inaccuracies/lies.

If DB had known 2 significant shareholders would dump their remaining shares into the market on the release of the excellent volumetrics RNS, you could argue that the timing of the placing wasn't right, but he didn't. The share price should have been over 0.3 following volumetrics, but it wasn't and it was too late to pull the placing. Humber is irrelevant to this situation currently, and should prove to provide opportunity.
If you're irritated you didn't participate in the placing I will remind you you could have bought at the placing price a few days ago, and may well be able to in the coming days - plus you won't have to pay the high commission rates.

You really are a prick, aren't you oiler. DB had no choice but to step up to the plate and do the placing to hold onto our share of WN. If you think he knew any of the placees in the city, you are delusional.

The planning inspector said by the end of December. It will probably be on 16th.

BWM, it seems UJO shareholders lost a fortune because of this. David Bramhill has been threatened, his reputation has been shredded, and the company name has been dragged through the mud. From what I know of him he'll take it personally and the culprit will be brought to book.

I said from my experience. I know nothing about Rockrose. But you make an interesting point.
Normally the FCA are not interested. However, THIS company have clearly taken this situation very seriously, and are going to progress a prosecution at this stage without the FCA or SFO, in order to restore the reputation of the company and discourage market abusers targeting UJO shareholders in the future. It may subsequently be taken up by the authorities I suppose.

Reaction, I'm clearly no genius, but the only times a company goes into suspension from my experience, is when the directors have f'd up, and they didn't. Suspension sends a worrying signal to the market.

Sorry MF, but just because it's red it doesn't mean it's a sell. Normally you'd need to check what the bid and ask prices were at the time of the trade to try to work out if they were buys or sells, but on the morning of a placing RNS share prices will be all over the place. Having said that, if they had all been sells the close share price would have been lower than the open, so clearly they were probably mostly buys.

For me that's the post of the day Christoff.

To be honest in reality it makes no difference to the price going forward whether they were massive buys or massive sells, but tell me MF, why are you so confident they were sells?