Member Info for RuckRover

YNWA.

Ray,
Perhaps you would grace us with your opinion on the DE selling debate then?

GF,
How on earth can "we just don't know" be spinning. I had said umpteen times it COULD be DE but equally if could NOT be.
Think about it sensibly for a second
It COULD be DE
DE Could have finished weeks ago.
DE may be hanging fire (at the request of SCLP or just for a better price - after all first dose news can't be more than a few weeks away.)
DE isn't the only one with a sizeable investment
We don't know that the 50k plus sales are the same person
100k on its own isn't a big amount for a single seller
So it's either "it must be DE" vs "it could be anyone"
So carry on spinning, carry on claiming it's everyone else spinning try not to get too dizzy.

GF,
" Why are some so desperate to try and spin that DE isn’t selling?"
As far as I can see there is NO ONE spinning that DE ISN'T selling. He said he would, he was telling the truth and he may well be selling or he may not. We just dont't know.
You need to look at yourself - it's YOU who is spinning he IS selling. Why? Why are you so desperate to pin the sells on one individual? Can you not bare the thought that another person may think this is a good time to sell?
Hence your "someone knows something" post yesterday in an attempt to bolster morale. ATB

GF,
"As fast as someone (DE) unloads they get taken out. I wonder why"
I guess the question was to anyone, not specifically addressed to me. As stated before, the reason people buy is because they expect or hope to get a return. News of first patient jabbed is imminent and I expect this alone will put 15% on the SP. successful data from the trials could put us in the WTP 150% territory.

Ray, WTP,
Yes, you've got the idea - people buy shares in the hope or expectation that they will make a return, be it big or small. We have no idea who is selling or who is buying. We don't know why people sell or buy.
Hope that answers your question GF?

Perhaps hoping to make a quick 15%?

Tuesday!
Atb

WTP,
You don't need permission to use quotation marks. Just make sue what's inside them is what was actually said!

WTP,
I agree, great to get a mention by a group of professional investment advisors. But as they are professional they will present a balanced view - yes, it's potentially a good return but bios are high risk and SCLP will not make money for many years (if never)

So why take exception to the bits you'd rather not see and call it "under researched"?

Ray,
Oh course, anyone not saying Uber-positive things are under researched!
I think the point they are making is that the cost of getting a drug to market is greater than the cash in the bank. So where's the shortfall coming from? A sale, a licensing deal or further dilution.

crumbs, LOL!
Yes, "I see your glass is half empty - would you like another?"
Rather than "I see your still half full, I'll just get myself one."

AB, you are correct, I have not divested. In fact, I have steadily accumulated the past eight years (apart from a two year moratorium) . The more recent purchases (5p-13p) have brought my average down.

GF,
"Like I said earlier. LTHs know by now who to also not listen to"
I agree, I'm a LTH and I know exactly who not to listen to!

WTP,
"the £8 target rarely gets mentioned on here, if at all"
I think that was the point I was making (as well as AB)

GF,
Yes, I think £1 is possible, I have never said anything different.
"Yet you and others are talking sclp down"
Please show me a single post I have made in the last seven years where I have talked SCLP down.
Unless of course pointing out that we may be worth 60p-£1 and NOT £8.
TBH, if I stumbled across a share that had traded between 7p and 28p in the past year with a historic high of 60p (pre-dilution) and some idiot was spouting £8 I'd probably run a mile.
Surely you can see how damaging this one-sided, rose-tinted glasses approach is?
Yes you can, you already worked out that £1 is x5 the current price!

AB,
TBH, I don't think many, if any, team ramp members put a price on the shares. Their only input by default is to NOT dispute the £8 touted by the banished one eight years ago when there were only 224K shares in issue. He has not revised that estimate down to cater for the dilution as there are now four times the number of shares in issue. There has been little in the way of support or denial for this historic number.
Despite not being a member of team ramp, I do see a faint possibly of multi pounds - £2. But I think 60p-£1 is more realistic.
So I think team ramp is a bit of a misnomer, I think "team anti-team realistic" would be more appropriate.

WTP,
I think when you put things in quotation marks, people will assume it is a direct quotation - so thanks for clarifying that.

Yes, well spotted Ray, you beat me to it!

In addition to the changes you and Bermuda have highlighted, a minor amendment was changing the spelling of computerised to the US computerized. I wonder if this is because they expect US interest or a US study centre?

WTP,
"a classic doomie post is 15:30 today, when it contains a "this price won't hold 20p""

Actually it's a classic misquote. You should withdraw, apologise and be a little more factual in future.