Member Info for RuckRover

TF, I find your hounding of C7 just as annoying as Lozan’s CAPS.

Yes, I enjoyed your post rats and do get your drift. Historically, there have been some fantastic news releases resulting in a temporary sp rise followed by a fall back. Perhaps there should be a total news black out then in 20 years time the headline comes out “Scancell cures cancer; Professor Durrant awarded Nobel prize”
That should get us to 22p don’t you think?

Any idea when the Novichok phase 2 trial starts?

steve67,
Just to clarify the improvement with adjuvant...

At the 2017 AGM the following appeared on the presentation slides:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultra-efficient linked adjuvant identified for Modi-1 increasing potency up to 100-fold; process development for manufacture underway

Linked adjuvant allows a 10-100 fold reduction in dose
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected manufacture of MODI1 with Amplivant was stated as H12019. It will be interesting to see if we are still on track and if there have been further developments or data gathered at this year's AGM

Yes, thanks for the comprehensive reply Bermuda. The posters are interesting.

Bermuda,
Thanks. So Scancell could have used any number of adjuvants (including Diprovocim) but chose amplivant.

So diprovocim is just an adjuvant like amplivant. Do we know what the vaccine is that it was used in conjunction with?
Could it possibly be scib1. If not, could it be used with scib1 or Moditope?

Ray, no need to keep quite just because you don't understand the science. I don't understand the details of the internal combustion engine but still manage to drive a car. There are plenty of important topics apart from the science even if it's just how you feel.
It's NOT all about the science.

Ray, I can assure you I am VERY optimistic. If you were pessimistic you wouldn't invest would you? I believe you can be optimistic and realistic at the same time. I am optimistic about the long term future but realistic about the hurdles to overcome along the way and the time it will take to get there.

Morning Ray, All,
You mean the original Moditope announcement back in 2012? If so, apologies, no disrespect intended.
What made you stay so quite for 6 years! Or should I say, what made you become so vocal after 6 years
?

Dragon, no I’m not clairvoyant lol?
All you need to do is look at history. The past 4 years the results have been announced with “Scancell loss widens”, with the share price marked down. It would seem that there are some who react to a headline and drop instead of considering All the news of the past year. As I said, nothing to concern long term holders. ATB

Ray, thanks for the response.
You wrote “To me, a good understanding of what you are buying into is more important than worrying about whether there will be further share dilution. “
I appreciate you are relatively new to Scancell and possibly investing in bios. I can assure you I DO have a good understanding of what I have bought into. I believe it is equally important to consider the effects of dilution. Think about it - dilution means your shares are worth less than what they were before dilution occurs. I’ve seen it many times before. Scancell are a small bio with no revenue. As such they are vulnerable. What they do have is potentially very valuable but how much of that value us little pis will eventually see will depend on things like dilution. You have to look at the big picture.

Sorry Inan, posts don't have to have content necessarily. This is a forum for both answers and QUESTIONS.
Your reply to lHatton said:
"" if you have a direct question i will try and answer""

So my direct question was do you think the forward looking statement we are expecting in the results will cover future funding and perhaps give a hint as to whether this will come from deals or by passing round the hat to existing holders?

""what are you trying to achieve ? ""
I am trying to achieve an understanding of when my investment is likely to come to fruition so I can retire.

Inan,

Do you think they will looking far enough ahead to see the next round of fundraising?

BigD,Bermuda,Leas,

Yes, very poignant and very sobering read. Wishing Mrs leas ATVB.

Let's hope we'll all be shouting hallelujah when she comes!

Matt, don’t worry about the predictions, most of us have been off target at some point. I think all price predictions will come true, it’s just the timescales that are off. The main thing is most of us are holding tight onto our shares and just waiting.

C7,
A lot of what you have said will resonate with many here. High hopes for grand challenge, Moditope, AGM etc.
Cynical, yes but optimistic.
Do I think people here are ignorant and apathetic? I don’t know and don’t care! (Joke)
ATB.

2cv,

I'll look forward to it ;)

Inanaco,
As usual, you seem to have gotten yourself completely off track and into some difficulty.
Let me try and get you back on track:

Earlier today 2CVguy asked when we would see some "monetisation of assets" as CH stated this would be achieved in the "near term". C7 said he "hoped" this would be "sooner". TF then kindly chipped in with some quotes from the CH interview. Terms such as "short term", "medium term", "over the next year or two". DA posed the question was it "very near term". A number of contributers took the time to listen to the clip and reported that the phrase CH used was "near term" (rather than "very near term")

2cvguy then posed the following:

"Great science leads to great products, great products to great data, great data to great deals, and so I see Scancell now moving through that trajectory towards the latter half of that equation and I think this is a time where the company is going to be in a position where it is able to monetize some of those assets over the near to short term".

and the follow up question:
"So maybe the question for the AGM is "how far along are we in the equation now ?".

To which I gave my OPINION:
"I would suggest we are not very far along this road. We have some products based on arguably sound science. Until the data is "great" we can't call the products or the science great. "

rHatton joined the discussion with:
"Completely agree. As everyone has been waiting for so many years for something to happen to change the decline in the value of their investments, its very easy to try to start interpolating words that are said by the board. "

You joined the discussion with:
"the trials are short ...

if they break the cancers ability to implement immune suppression its curtains, the tumours will disappear very quickly ...."

At this point we are having a fairly civilised discussion with positive contributions from everyone until you do the usual with:

"You have the option to sell ......
like i said put some meat on the bones ... what exactly are you fearful of ? waiting ?"

As usual you are trying to put words into peoples mouths. I never suggested selling and I never suggested being "fearful".

The only difference of opinion is on how long we need to wait. I suggested it could be a while you said it could be short. Fine. Now you are arguing you never said short???????????????????????????????

Better call it a day, this is turning into the donut sketch again.