RE: Thoughts24 Jun 2020 11:05
Konar,
Ok, I concede you, Ray and TF are correct.
I tried to get the figure as round as possible, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 are easier to work with than 900% or 11 years.
The principle I was trying to get across was an apparent enormous rise Of 900% or 1000% If taken over a long period of time is a much smaller annual % (26%).
Thanks for the correction, that’s what these boards are about, everyone contributing something in order to get a clearer and more accurate picture.